首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand Journal of Ecology >When is it coevolution? The case of ground weta and fleshy fruits in New Zealand
【24h】

When is it coevolution? The case of ground weta and fleshy fruits in New Zealand

机译:什么时候协同进化?新西兰的湿西葫芦和肉质水果案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both tree and ground weta have been proposed as potential seed dispersers of some New Zealand fruit. We examine evidence for coevolution of ground weta and fleshy fruits as suggested by Burns (2006). We found that although ground weta consume fruits from Gaultheria depressa and G. antipoda, they do not do so in a way that would suggest they had coevolved as dispersers with these or other New Zealand plants (Coprosma, Muehlenbeckia, Leucopogon). In our experiments, ground weta ate fruits piecemeal and avoided most seeds even when these were very small (<1 mm) as in Gaultheria. We also found a positive preference for eating fruits of plants with seeds that were too big for ground weta to ingest. Several lines of reasoning we explore lend no support to the proposal that ground weta have coevolved with New Zealand plants resulting in the unusual characteristics displayed by many species (pale fruit presented within a divaricating canopy).
机译:树木湿地和地面湿地都已被提议作为某些新西兰水果的潜在种子分散剂。我们研究了Burns(2006)提出的地面湿谷和肉质果实共同进化的证据。我们发现,尽管地面湿地消耗了Gaultheria depressa和G. antipoda的果实,但这样做的方式并不表明它们已经与这些或其他新西兰植物(Coprosma,Muehlenbeckia,Leucopogon)一起作为分散剂进化了。在我们的实验中,地面浸湿会零碎吃水果,即使像Gaultheria一样,这些种子很小(<1毫米)也能避免大多数种子。我们还发现,人们偏爱食用种子太大而不能被地面湿地摄取的植物的果实。我们探索的几种推理方法不支持地面湿气与新西兰植物共同进化,从而导致许多物种表现出不同寻常的特征(苍白的果实出现在分叉的冠层中)的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号