首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition & dietetics: the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia >Which 'nutritional models-of-care' improve energy and protein intake, clinical outcomes and malnutrition in hospitalised patients?
【24h】

Which 'nutritional models-of-care' improve energy and protein intake, clinical outcomes and malnutrition in hospitalised patients?

机译:哪些“营养保健模式”可改善住院患者的能量和蛋白质摄入,临床结果和营养不良?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: This systematic review examined studies for improvement in energy and protein intake, nutritional status, and clinical outcomes when specific nutritional models-of-care (protected mealtimes, feeding assistance, communal dining and the red tray initiative) were implemented in hospitalised acute and rehabilitation patients. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. Reference lists were also hand searched, and a key author search was completed. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria and assessed trial quality.Results: A total of 172 articles were identified from the search strategy, and after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven articles were included for final review. Most studies found a mean improvement in energy and protein intake from the implementation of the feeding assistance and communal dining models, although the overall quality of the evidence is low. No studies found a significant difference in weight, and the two trials measuring key clinical outcomes found no differences in length of stay and most markers of nutritional status; results for mortality were mixed. Protected mealtimes had a negative effect on energy and protein intake, although only one study was included for review; and no studies were found looking at the red tray initiative. Conclusions: While some of the evidence appears positive, this review highlights that there is a scarcity of high-quality evidence to support the use of specific nutritional models-of-care to improve energy and protein intake in hospitalised patients. Large-scale multicentre trials focusing more on primary outcomes of clinical relevance are still required.
机译:目的:这项系统评价研究了在住院急症患者中实施特定营养护理模式(保护进餐时间,进食辅助,公共就餐和“红盘计划”)时,能量和蛋白质摄入,营养状况和临床结局的改善研究。康复病人。方法:在MEDLINE,Embase和CINAHL上进行电子数据库搜索。还手动搜索了参考文献清单,并完成了关键作者的搜索。结果:从检索策略中共鉴定出172篇文章,应用纳入和排除标准后,有7篇文章被纳入最终审查。大多数研究发现,通过实施喂养辅助和公共就餐模式,虽然能量和蛋白质摄入量得到了平均改善,但证据的总体质量却很低。没有研究发现体重有显着差异,并且两项测量关键临床结局的试验均未发现住院时间和大多数营养状况指标存在差异。死亡率结果好坏参半。受保护的进餐时间对能量和蛋白质的摄入有负面影响,尽管仅纳入一项研究进行了回顾。尚未发现有关红色托盘计划的任何研究。结论:虽然某些证据似乎是肯定的,但本综述强调指出,缺乏高质量的证据来支持使用特定的营养保健模型来改善住院患者的能量和蛋白质摄入量。仍然需要更多的集中于临床相关性主要结果的大规模多中心试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号