...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >Presurgical (99m)Tc-sestamibi brain SPET/CT versus SPET: a comparison with MRI and histological data in 33 patients with brain tumours.
【24h】

Presurgical (99m)Tc-sestamibi brain SPET/CT versus SPET: a comparison with MRI and histological data in 33 patients with brain tumours.

机译:术前(99m)Tc-Sestamibi脑SPET / CT与SPET:33例脑肿瘤患者的MRI和组织学数据比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: A morphofunctional approach to the management of brain tumours has been claimed to increase diagnostic accuracy. Among the proposed single-photon emission tomography (SPET) tracers, (99m)Tc-sestamibi is able to distinguish recurrent tumour from radio-necrosis and to identify early response or resistance to chemotherapy. Major drawbacks of sestamibi, that is, poor morphological resolution and the sites of physiological uptake, could be overcome by dual-modality, integrated systems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the real usefulness of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPET/computed tomography (CT) and to establish a semiquantitative index. METHODS: Charts from 33 consecutive patients selected for surgery, who underwent preoperative SPET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were reviewed. Tumours were confirmed histologically after the surgery in all patients and classified according to WHO recommendations. Semiquantitative indexes were obtained on images (maximum likelihood expectation maximization reconstructed) with and without attenuation correction and visual analysis of SPET versus SPET/CT was performed. RESULTS: A significant statistical difference was shown between SPET and SPET/CT in terms of the delineation of medial shift, oedema and the ability to distinguish tumour from the skull-meninges complex and plexus. With regard to semiquantitative indexes, a ratio obtained comparing counts/pixel derived from a region of interest in the tumour area with mirrored region of interest in the contralateral site revealed a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 71.45% in discriminating WHO grade 4 gliomas from a lower grade. CONCLUSION: SPET/CT can distinguish tumour from the skull and other sites of physiological uptake better than SPET alone (as confirmed by MRI in all cases) and affords a morphological map. The proposed semiquantitative index also seems promising in identifying higher-grade disease. SPET/CT thus seems a useful additional tool in brain tumour management, especially when MRI is not feasible or PET/CT is not available.
机译:目的:一种形态功能性方法来治疗脑肿瘤已被认为可以提高诊断的准确性。在提出的单光子发射断层扫描(SPET)示踪剂中,(99m)Tc-西司他比能够区分复发性肿瘤和放射性坏死,并识别早期反应或对化疗的耐药性。 sestamibi的主要缺点,即差的形态分辨率和生理吸收部位,可以通过双模式,集成系统克服。这项研究的目的是调查(99m)Tc-sestamibi SPET /计算机断层扫描(CT)的真正有用性,并建立一个半定量指标。方法:回顾性分析了33例连续接受手术治疗的患者的术前SPET / CT和核磁共振成像(MRI)。所有患者术后均在组织学上证实肿瘤,并根据WHO的建议进行分类。在有和没有衰减校正的情况下(重建的最大似然期望最大化)在图像上获得半定量指标,并对SPET与SPET / CT进行视觉分析。结果:SPET和SPET / CT在内侧移位,浮肿和区分肿瘤与颅脑脑膜复合物和丛的能力方面显示出显着的统计学差异。关于半定量指标,将肿瘤区域感兴趣区域与对侧位点镜像感兴趣区域的计数/像素进行比较所获得的比率显示,在区分WHO 4级神经胶质瘤时敏感性为90.9%,特异性为71.45%。低年级。结论:SPET / CT可以比单独使用SPET更好地区分肿瘤与颅骨及其他生理摄取部位(所有病例均经MRI证实),并提供了形态图。拟议的半定量指标在鉴定高等疾病方面也似乎很有希望。因此,SPET / CT在脑肿瘤治疗中似乎是有用的附加工具,尤其是在MRI不可行或无法使用PET / CT时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号