...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition >Validation of a new method for estimating resting energy expenditure of non-ambulatory tube-fed patients with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities.
【24h】

Validation of a new method for estimating resting energy expenditure of non-ambulatory tube-fed patients with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities.

机译:验证一种新的方法来估计患有严重神经发育障碍的非卧床喂食患者的静息能量消耗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE:We assessed the bias and precision of the Arlington Developmental Center (ADC) equations derived from our previous study and the Harris-Benedict equations for estimating resting energy expenditure in non-ambulatory, tube-fed patients with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities.METHODS:Fifteen non-ambulatory patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities referred to the nutrition consult service for evaluation of enteral tube feeding via a permanent ostomy who had a steady-state resting energy expenditure measurement performed by indirect calorimetry were included in the study. The predicted energy expenditure values were compared with the measured resting energy expenditure values and evaluated for bias and precision.RESULTS:Both ADC equations were more precise (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-22% and 10-18% error, respectively) for the total population than the Harris-Benedict equations (95% CI: 17-40% error). The ADC-2 equation was precise (95% CI: 7-15% error) and unbiased (95% CI: -5 to 139 kcal/d) in contrast to the Harris-Benedict equations (95% CI: 23-54% error; bias, +230 to 365 kcal/d) for patients with cerebral palsy and fixed upper extremity contractures. The Harris-Benedict equations were precise and unbiased (95% CI: 3-14% error; bias, -182 to 39 kcal/d) for patients with cerebral palsy with preservation of upper body movement, whereas the ADC equations were biased toward underprediction and associated with greater error (95% CI: -367 to -73 kcal/d and 7-26% error; 95% CI: -379 to -109 kcal/d and 9-27% error, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:The ADC-2 equation was unbiased and more precise in non-ambulatory adult patients with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities and fixed upper extremity contractures, whereas the Harris-Benedict equations were more precise and unbiased for those with preservation of limited functional and non-functional upper extremity movement.
机译:目的:我们评估了先前研究得出的阿灵顿发育中心(ADC)方程和哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程的偏倚和精确度,用于估计患有严重神经发育障碍的非门诊,管饲患者的静息能量消耗。方法:十五患有非发育性神经发育障碍的非卧床患者转介至营养咨询服务,以通过永久造口术评估肠管喂养,他们通过间接量热法进行了稳态静息能量消耗测量,被纳入研究。将预测的能量消耗值与测得的静态能量消耗值进行比较,并评估偏差和精度。结果:两个ADC方程均更为精确(95%置信区间[CI]:分别为9-22%和10-18%的误差) )代表哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程式(95%CI:17-40%误差)。与Harris-Benedict方程(95%CI:23-54%)相比,ADC-2方程式精确(95%CI:7-15%误差)和无偏(95%CI:-5至139 kcal / d)错误;偏瘫,+ 230至365 kcal / d)适用于脑瘫和固定上肢挛缩的患者。对于患有上肢活动性脑瘫的脑瘫患者,Harris-Benedict方程精确无偏(95%CI:3-14%误差; -182至39 kcal / d偏倚),而ADC方程偏向于低估并且具有更大的误差(95%CI:-367至-73 kcal / d和7-26%误差; 95%CI:-379至-109 kcal / d和9-27%误差)。对于患有严重神经发育障碍和固定上肢挛缩的非卧床成年患者,ADC-2方程是无偏的,并且更精确,而对于那些保留了有限的功能性和非功能性上肢运动的患者,Harris-Benedict方程更为精确和无偏。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号