首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Modelling runoff and soil erosion in logged forests: scope and application of some existing models.
【24h】

Modelling runoff and soil erosion in logged forests: scope and application of some existing models.

机译:在森林砍伐中模拟径流和土壤侵蚀:现有模型的范围和应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Predictive erosion models are useful tools for evaluating the impact of land-use practices on soil and water properties, and as often used by environmental protection authorities, for setting guidelines and standards for regulation purposes. This study examines the application of three erosion models of varying complexity and design for predicting runoff and soil erosion from logged forest compartments in south eastern Australia. These are: the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP), and TOPOG, a physically based hydrologic modelling package. Data on rates of soil loss and redistribution collected during a series of large-scale rainfall simulator experiments were used as model input parameters and validation. The models were evaluated in terms of general ease of use, input data requirements and accuracy of process understanding and prediction. Results suggest that in this application the USLE overestimated soil loss, and have the limitation that it does not predict sediment yield or sediment redistribution for specific storm events. When used at the hillslope scale, WEPP and TOPOG have predicted runoff and soil loss reasonably well, particularly on disturbed surfaces such as skid trails. On less disturbed surfaces such as the general harvesting area, both models performed less accurately, generally under-predicting soil loss and sediment yield, notably on sites with low observed values. The complexity and data requirements of WEPP and TOPOG limit their usability as a general-purpose, erosion hazard predicting tool. In terms of process understanding, none of the existing models accurately depict the nature and extent of sediment redistribution quantified in the rainfall simulator experiments. In order to advance the application and accuracy of modelling tools in forestry environments, this redistribution process should be considered integral to the refinement and redevelopment of future models..
机译:预测性侵蚀模型是评估土地使用方式对土壤和水质影响的有用工具,环保部门经常使用这种预测性模型来制定指导性准则和标准。本研究考察了三种复杂程度不同的侵蚀模型和设计在预测澳大利亚东南部伐木林区径流和土壤侵蚀中的应用。它们是:通用土壤流失方程(USLE),水蚀预测项目(WEPP)和TOPOG(基于物理的水文建模软件包)。在一系列大型降雨模拟器实验中收集的土壤流失和再分配速率数据用作模型输入参数和验证。根据一般易用性,输入数据要求以及过程理解和预测的准确性对模型进行了评估。结果表明,在该应用中,USLE高估了土壤流失,并且具有局限性,即它无法预测特定暴风雨事件的沉积物产量或沉积物再分配。当在山坡规模上使用时,WEPP和TOPOG可以很好地预测径流和土壤流失,特别是在受干扰的表面(如滑道)上。在受干扰程度较小的表面(例如总收割面积)上,这两种模型的表现均较不准确,通常会低估土壤损失和沉积物产量,尤其是在观测值较低的地点。 WEPP和TOPOG的复杂性和数据要求限制了它们作为通用的侵蚀危险预测工具的可用性。就过程理解而言,现有模型均无法准确描述降雨模拟器实验中量化的沉积物再分配的性质和程度。为了提高建模工具在林业环境中的应用和准确性,应将这种重新分配过程视为将来模型的完善和重新开发的组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号