...
首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >Communication education for pre-licensure nursing students: Literature review 2002-2013
【24h】

Communication education for pre-licensure nursing students: Literature review 2002-2013

机译:执照前护理学生的传播教育:文献综述2002-2013

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: Effective communication skills are fundamental to good nursing care and required by certification bodies for nursing education. The purpose of this literature review was to update one done in 2002 of communication education to pre-licensure registered nursing students. That review concluded that it was unclear which interventions were most effective due to methodological and other quality issues. The goal of this review was to identify recent educational methods, frameworks, and evaluation tools and to assess the quality of this recent evidence. Design: Literature review. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Review Methods: Inclusion criteria were articles in English, 2002 to 2013, full text available, addressing nurse:patient communication, and educational interventions. Exclusion criteria were inter-professional interventions as they are not yet as widely available. Studies were evaluated using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice (JHNEBP) Rating Scale. This scale categorizes the levels of evidence and methodological quality. Results: The search yielded 457 titles, 115 abstracts, and 38 articles. Twenty studies met inclusion and exclusion search criteria. They included a range of research designs, samples, and outcomes. In line with recent communication educational trends, the interventions all involved active learning. Using the JHNEBP scale, the quality of the 20 studies was low due to both research design and methodological issues. Conclusion: Despite the importance of communication in nursing education, the quality of evidence to support specific communication interventions continues to be low. Recommendations for future communication education research are to 1) explore the highest quality designs available and use randomization where possible; 2) more consistently use theoretical frameworks and their accompanying outcome measures; and 3) that tools be tested for evidence of reliability and validity.
机译:目标:有效的沟通技巧是良好护理的基础,也是认证机构进行护理教育所必需的。这篇文献综述的目的是更新2002年对注册前注册护理学生进行的传播教育。该审查得出结论,由于方法和其他质量问题,尚不清楚哪种干预最有效。这次审查的目的是确定最近的教育方法,框架和评估工具,并评估最近证据的质量。设计:文献综述。数据来源:PubMed,CINAHL和PsychINFO。审查方法:纳入标准为2002年至2013年的英文文章,全文,涉及护士与患者的沟通和教育干预措施。排除标准是跨行业的干预措施,因为目前尚不广泛。使用约翰霍普金斯大学护理循证实践(JHNEBP)评估量表对研究进行评估。该量表将证据水平和方法学质量分类。结果:搜索得到457个标题,115个摘要和38个文章。二十项研究符合纳入和排除搜索标准。其中包括一系列研究设计,样本和结果。与最近的交流教育趋势一致,所有干预措施都涉及主动学习。使用JHNEBP量表,由于研究设计和方法问题,这20项研究的质量均很低。结论:尽管沟通在护理教育中很重要,但是支持特定沟通干预的证据质量仍然很低。对未来的传播教育研究的建议是:1)探索可用的最高质量的设计,并在可能的情况下使用随机化; 2)更一致地使用理论框架及其伴随的结果度量;和3)测试工具的可靠性和有效性证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号