...
首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Fisheries Management >Using Positional Data from Vessel Monitoring Systems to Validate the Logbook-Reported Area Fished and the Stock Allocation of Commercial Fisheries Landings
【24h】

Using Positional Data from Vessel Monitoring Systems to Validate the Logbook-Reported Area Fished and the Stock Allocation of Commercial Fisheries Landings

机译:使用来自船只监视系统的位置数据来验证日志记录的捕鱼区域和商业渔业用地的库存分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Stock allocations derived from vessel monitoring system (VMS) positional data from northeastern U.S. fisheries were compared with those obtained from mandatory vessel trip report (VTR) logbooks. A gear-specific speed algorithm was applied to VMS positions collected in 2005 from otter trawl, Atlantic sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus dredge, sink gill-net, and benthic longline fisheries to estimate the locations of fishing activity. Estimated fishing locations were used to reallocate the stock area landings of eight federally managed groundfish species. The accuracy of the VMS method relative to that of the mandatory logbooks wag assessed using haul locations and catch data recorded by at-sea observers. The VMS algorithm tended to overestimate the number of statistical areas fished, such that when a trip's fishing activity occurred in a single statistical area, logbooks more accurately reflected the true fishing location. However, when fishing activity occurred in multiple statistical areas, the VMS algorithm showed appreciable gains relative to logbook data. Compared with mandatory logbooks, the VMS method achieved distributions of stock landings closer to observer estimates in 77.8% of the cases examined. The stock allocation percentages from both the VMS- and VTR-based methods were within 1.7% for all stocks, suggesting that the impacts on total stock allocations are relatively minor. However, these small differences represent major relative differences in stock landings for less abundant stocks such as southern New England-Mid-Atlantic yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea, where the VTR-based method allocated 61.9% more landings than the VMS-based method. The VMS-based method is not a replacement for the VTR-based method; however, it can and should be used as a tool to identify those vessels for which targeted outreach activities would improve the accuracy of VTR statistical area reporting.
机译:将来自美国东北部渔业的船舶监控系统(VMS)位置数据得出的种群分配与从强制性船舶出行报告(VTR)日志中获得的种群分配进行了比较。在2005年从水獭拖网,大西洋扇贝Placopecten magellanicus挖泥机,水槽g网和底栖延绳钓渔业中收集的VMS位置采用了特定于齿轮的速度算法,以估计捕鱼活动的地点。估计的捕鱼地点用于重新分配八种由联邦政府管理的底层鱼类的种群上岸量。 VMS方法相对于强制性航海日志的准确度是使用拖船位置评估并捕获海上观察员记录的数据。 VMS算法往往会高估捕鱼的统计区域的数量,因此,当旅行的捕鱼活动发生在单个统计区域时,日志会更准确地反映出真实的捕鱼位置。但是,当在多个统计区域中发生捕捞活动时,相对于日志数据,VMS算法显示出可观的收益。与强制性日志相比,VMS方法在77.8%的调查案例中实现了库存下降的分布,更接近观察员的估计。基于VMS和VTR的方法对所有股票的股票分配百分比均在1.7%以内,这表明对总股票分配的影响相对较小。但是,这些较小的差异代表了数量较少的种群(如新英格兰南部-大西洋中部的黄尾比目鱼Limanda ferruginea)在种群着陆方面的主要相对差异,其中基于VTR的方法比基于VMS的方法分配的着陆量高61.9%。基于VMS的方法不能替代基于VTR的方法。但是,它可以并且应该用作一种工具,以识别那些针对其的外展活动可以提高VTR统计区域报告准确性的船舶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号