首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.
【24h】

Limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.

机译:磁共振成像和磁共振血管造影在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are being used with increasing frequency for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Although the literature suggests that MRI and MRA are accurate, we have observed that both are associated with a high likelihood of false-positive results in the diagnosis of aneurysms. We prospectively evaluated and compared the accuracy of MRI/MRA versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Over the course of 2 years, 133 patients diagnosed with one or more unruptured intracranial aneurysms by MRI/MRA were prospectively evaluated in an outpatient setting. The patients were advised to undergo cerebral four-vessel DSA, and the results from DSA were compared with MRI/MRA findings. RESULTS: In 59% of cases, the DSA and MRI/MRA findings were markedly different. Specifically, in 38% of MRI/MRA-positive cases, DSA findings were completely normal, showing no aneurysms. In an additional 21% of cases, although DSA confirmed the presence of an aneurysm, it differed substantially from MRI/MRA findings in terms of aneurysm location, number of aneurysms, or aneurysm type. In general, the false-positive aneurysms by MRI/MRA were smaller than 5 mm and were most commonly identified in the anterior communicating artery region. CONCLUSION: MRI/MRA studies are often inaccurate in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and should not be used as the sole diagnostic studies for intracranial aneurysms. Other radiographic modalities should be further investigated as alternatives to MRI/MRA for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.
机译:目的:磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)被越来越多地用于颅内动脉瘤的诊断。尽管文献表明MRI和MRA是准确的,但我们已经观察到两者在动脉瘤的诊断中与假阳性结果的可能性很高。我们前瞻性评估和比较MRI / MRA与数字减影血管造影(DSA)在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的准确性。方法:在2年的时间里,在门诊患者中对133例经MRI / MRA诊断为未破裂的颅内动脉瘤的患者进行了前瞻性评估。建议患者进行脑四支血管DSA检查,并将DSA检查结果与MRI / MRA检查结果进行比较。结果:在59%的病例中,DSA和MRI / MRA的发现明显不同。具体而言,在38%的MRI / MRA阳性病例中,DSA检查结果完全正常,无动脉瘤。在另外21%的病例中,尽管DSA确认存在动脉瘤,但在动脉瘤位置,动脉瘤数量或动脉瘤类型方面,它与MRI / MRA的发现大不相同。通常,MRI / MRA假阳性动脉瘤小于5 mm,最常见于前交通动脉区域。结论:MRI / MRA研究通常在颅内动脉瘤的诊断中不准确,因此不应作为颅内动脉瘤的唯一诊断研究。作为MRI / MRA的替代方法,应进一步研究其他放射照相方式,以诊断颅内动脉瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号