首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Distraction, Compression, Extension, and Reduction Combined With Joint Remodeling and Extra-articular Distraction: Description of 2 New Modifications for Its Application in Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Prospective Study in 79 Cases
【24h】

Distraction, Compression, Extension, and Reduction Combined With Joint Remodeling and Extra-articular Distraction: Description of 2 New Modifications for Its Application in Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Prospective Study in 79 Cases

机译:牵张,压缩,伸展和复位结合关节重塑和关节外牵张:描述其在基底内翻和寰枢椎脱位中应用的两种新变型:79例前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Recent strategies for treatment of basilar invagination (BI) and atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) are based on simultaneous posterior reduction and fixation.OBJECTIVE:To describe new modifications of the procedure distraction, compression, extension, and reduction (DCER), ie, joint remodeling (JRM) and extra-articular distraction (EAD) in patients with vertical joints, and to quantify the improvement in joint indices, ie, sagittal inclination (SI), craniocervical tilt (CCT), and coronal inclination.METHODS:Prospective study (May 2010 to September 2014). Joint indices measured included (normal values): SI (87.15 5.65 degrees), CCT (60.2 9.2 degrees), and coronal inclination (110.3 4.23 degrees). Surgical procedures included DCER alone (performed in SI <100 degrees, group I) or JRM with DCER (in SI: 100-160 degrees, group II), or EAD with DCER in severe BI with almost vertical joints (SI >160 degrees, group III).RESULTS:Seventy-nine patients were selected (mean, 22.5 years of age). All conventional indices improved significantly (P < .001). CCT improved in all groups (P < .01); group I (n = 32): 54 8.7 degrees (preoperative 80.71 12.72 degrees); group II (n = 40): 58 7.0 degrees (preoperative 86.5 14 degrees); group III (n = 7): 62 10.0 degrees (preoperative 104 11.2 degrees). SI improved in both group I and II, P < .01 (cannot be measured in group III). At long-term follow-up (n = 64, 29 8 months, range 12-39 months), the Nurick grade improved to 1.5 +/- 0.52 (preoperative: 3.4 +/- 0.65; P < .001).CONCLUSION:DCER seems to be an effective technique in reducing both BI and AAD. JRM and EAD with DCER are useful in moderate to severe BI and AAD (with SI >100 degrees). Joint indices provide useful information for surgical strategy and planning.ABBREVIATIONS:AAD, atlantoaxial dislocationBI, basilar invaginationCCT, craniocervical tiltCI, coronal joint inclinationCVJ, craniovertebral junctionDCER, distraction, compression, extension, and reductionEAD, extra-articular distractionJRM, joint remodelingSI, sagittal inclination
机译:背景:基底节内陷(BI)和寰枢椎脱位(AAD)的最新治疗策略是基于同时后路复位和固定。目的:描述对手术分心,加压,伸展和复位(DCER)的新修改,即垂直关节患者的关节重塑(JRM)和关节外撑开(EAD),并量化关节指数(即矢状倾角(SI),颅颈倾斜(CCT)和冠状倾角)的改善情况。方法:前瞻性研究(2010年5月至2014年9月)。测量的关节指数包括(正常值):SI(87.15 5.65度),CCT(60.2 9.2度)和冠状倾角(110.3 4.23度)。外科手术包括单独的DCER(在SI <100度,I组)或JRM与DCER(在SI:100-160度,II组),或在DC严重的BI中具有几乎垂直的关节(SI> 160度,结果:选择29例患者(平均年龄22.5岁)。所有常规指标均显着改善(P <.001)。所有组的CCT均改善(P <.01);第一组(n = 32):54 8.7度(术前80.71 12.72度);第二组(n = 40):58 7.0度(术前86.5 14度);第三组(n = 7):62 10.0度(术前104 11.2度)。 I组和II组的SI均改善,P <0.01(III组无法测量)。长期随访(n = 64,29 8个月,范围12-39个月),Nurick评分提高到1.5 +/- 0.52(术前:3.4 +/- 0.65; P <.001)。 DCER似乎是减少BI和AAD的有效技术。具有DCER的JRM和EAD可用于中度至重度的BI和AAD(SI> 100度)。关节指数为手术策略和计划提供有用的信息。缩写:AAD,寰枢椎脱位BI,基底内陷CCT,颅颈倾斜CI,冠状关节倾斜CVJ,颅骨交界处DCER,牵张,压迫,伸展和复位EAD,关节外牵张JRM,关节重塑SI,矢状位

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号