首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand Veterinary Journal >Using activity-based monitoring systems to detect dairy cows in oestrus: a field evaluation.
【24h】

Using activity-based monitoring systems to detect dairy cows in oestrus: a field evaluation.

机译:使用基于活动的监视系统检测发情期的奶牛:田间评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To assess the use and performance of activity-based oestrus detection systems (ODS) on two commercial dairy farms using a gold standard based on profiles of concentrations of progesterone in milk, artificial insemination (AI) records and pregnancy diagnosis results. METHODS: Two activity-based ODS were evaluated in mature cows on two large pasture-grazed dairy farms (>500 cows) over the first 3 weeks of AI. Farm 1 (n=286 cows) used a leg-mounted device and cows were drafted automatically based on activity alerts. Decisions regarding AI were then made based on tail-paint and cow history for these cows. Farm 2 (n=345 cows) used a collar-mounted device and activity alerts were used in conjunction with other information, before the farmer manually selected cows for AI. The gold standard to define the timing of oestrus was based on profiles of concentrations of progesterone in milk measured twice-weekly, used in conjunction with AI records and pregnancy diagnosis results. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for the activity-based ODS data only, and then for AI decisions, against the gold standard. RESULTS: Farm 1 had 195 confirmed oestrus events and 209 activity alerts were generated. The sensitivity of the activity-based ODS was 89.2% with a PPV of 83.3%. Using tail-paint and cow history to confirm activity-based alerts 175 cows were inseminated, resulting in a sensitivity of 89.2% and an improved PPV of 99.4%. Farm 2 had 343 confirmed oestrus events, and 726 alerts were generated by the activity-based ODS, giving a sensitivity of 69.7% with a PPV of 32.9%. A total of 386 cows had AI records, giving a sensitivity of 81.3% and PPV of 72.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The two activity-based ODS were used differently on-farm; one automatically selecting cows and the other supporting the manual selection of cows in oestrus. Only one achieved a performance level suggested to be acceptable as a stand-alone ODS. Use of additional tools, such as observation of tail paint to confirm activity-based oestrus alerts before AI, substantially improved the PPV. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A well performing activity-based ODS can be a valuable tool in identifying cows in oestrus prior to visual confirmation of oestrus status. However the performance of these ODS technologies varies considerably.
机译:目的:通过基于牛奶中孕酮浓度,人工授精(AI)记录和妊娠诊断结果的金标准,使用黄金标准评估基于活动的发情检测系统(ODS)在两个商业奶牛场中的使用和性能。方法:在AI的前3周内,在两个牧场牧场饲养的大型奶牛场(> 500头奶牛)的成年母牛中评估了两种基于活动的ODS。 1号农场(n = 286头母牛)使用了腿部安装的设备,并根据活动警报自动选出了母牛。然后根据这些母牛的尾巴油漆和母牛的历史做出有关AI的决定。 2号农场(n = 345头母牛)使用了安装在衣领上的设备,并且在农场主手动选择AI母牛之前,将活动警报与其他信息结合使用。定义发情时间的黄金标准是基于每周两次测量的牛奶中孕酮浓度的概况,并与AI记录和妊娠诊断结果结合使用。仅针对基于活动的ODS数据,然后针对黄金决策的AI决策,计算灵敏度和阳性预测值(PPV)。结果:农场1有195个已确认的发情事件,并产生了209个活动警报。基于活动的ODS的敏感性为89.2%,PPV为83.3%。使用尾部涂料和母牛的病史来确认基于活动的警报,对175头母牛进行了人工授精,敏感性为89.2%,PPV改善为99.4%。场2具有343个已确认的发情事件,基于活动的ODS产生了726个警报,敏感性为69.7%,PPV为32.9%。共有386头母牛有AI记录,敏感性为81.3%,PPV为72.3%。结论:两种基于活动的消耗臭氧层物质在农场使用的方式有所不同。一个自动选择母牛,另一个支持在发情期手动选择母牛。只有一个达到了建议的性能水平,可以作为独立的ODS接受。使用其他工具(例如观察尾漆以在AI之前确认基于活动的发情警报)大大改善了PPV。临床相关性:良好的基于​​活动的ODS可能是在目视确认发情状态之前鉴定发情母牛的有价值的工具。但是,这些ODS技术的性能差异很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号