首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
【24h】

Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.

机译:在连续性能测试期间患有阅读障碍的成年人和患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的成年人的信息处理差异和相似性:皮质电位的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Twenty male adults with ADHD, 16 dyslexic adults, 15 comorbid adults, and 16 normal controls were compared on performance and underlying brain responses, during a cued Continuous Performance Test (O-X CPT), with the aim of discovering features of information processing differentiating between the groups. The study evaluated both cue- and target-related processes by analysing performance measures (errors, reaction time, and variability of reaction time), and event-related potentials (ERPs). Cue-related ERP components included the Cue-N2, Cue-P3, contingent negative variation (CNV) consisting of the CNV1, related to cue orienting, and the CNV2, related to response preparation. For targets, a distinction was made between response-related (Go), and inhibitory (Nogo) processing. Target-related components included the Go-P3, Nogo-N2, and Nogo-P3. Performance deficits were found only for the ADHD group, who demonstrated a faster decline in response speed with time-on-task and greater overall within-subject variability. No group differences were found for cue-related ERP components. Yet, controlling for group differences in internalising problems, inhibitory control was reduced in all clinical groups compared to controls, as demonstrated by an absence of frontal amplification of P3 in the Nogo condition, relative to the Go condition. For the ADHD group, in contrast to the comorbid and the dyslexic group, this effect remained after controlling for externalising symptoms, indicating that only for the ADHD group deficiencies in inhibitory control were not explained by externalising behaviour.
机译:在提示的持续表现测验(OX CPT)中,比较了20名患有ADHD的男性成年人,16名阅读障碍的成年人,15名合并症的成年人和16名正常对照的表现和潜在的大脑反应,目的是发现区分两种信息的信息处理特征组。该研究通过分析绩效指标(错误,反应时间和反应时间的可变性)以及事件相关电位(ERP)来评估与提示和目标相关的过程。与提示相关的ERP组件包括Cue-N2,Cue-P3,由与提示定位相关的CNV1和与响应准备相关的CNV2构成的或有负变异(CNV)。对于目标,在响应相关(Go)和抑制(Nogo)处理之间进行了区分。与目标相关的组件包括Go-P3,Nogo-N2和Nogo-P3。仅在ADHD组中发现了性能缺陷,ADHD组表现出随着任务时间的变化,响应速度更快地下降,并且受试者内部总体差异更大。没有发现与提示相关的ERP组件的组差异。然而,控制内在化问题的组间差异,与对照组相比,所有临床组的抑制性对照都降低了,这在Nogo条件下相对于Go条件下不存在P3的额叶扩增得以证明。对于ADHD组,与合并症和阅读障碍组相反,这种效果在控制了外在症状后仍然存在,这表明仅对ADHD组抑制性控制的不足不能通过外在行为来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号