首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grido-grid working memory paradigm.
【24h】

Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grido-grid working memory paradigm.

机译:分类和坐标空间关系编码之间是否连续?来自网格/无网格工作记忆范式的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We ask the question whether the coding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations depends on different neural networks showing hemispheric specialization or whether there is continuity between these two coding types. The 'continuous spatial coding' hypothesis would mean that the two coding types rely essentially on the same neural network consisting of more general-purpose processes, such as visuo-spatial attention, but with a different weighting of these general processes depending on exact task requirements. With event-related fMRI, we have studied right-handed male subjects performing a grido-grid visuo-spatial working memory task inducing categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding. Our data support the 'continuous spatial coding' hypothesis, indicating that, while based on the same fronto-parieto-occipital neural network than categorical spatial relations coding, the coding of coordinate spatial relations relies more heavily on attentional and executive processes, which could induce hemispheric differences similar to those described in the literature. The results also show that visuo-spatial working memory consists of a short-term posterior store with a capacity of up to three elements in the parietal and extrastriate cortices. This store depends on the presence of a visible space categorization and thus can be used for the coding of categorical spatial relations. When no visible space categorization is given or when more than three elements have to be coded, additional attentional and executive processes are recruited, mainly located in the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex.
机译:我们提出这样一个问题:分类空间坐标关系与坐标空间关系的编码是否取决于显示半球专业化的不同神经网络,或者这两种编码类型之间是否存在连续性。 “连续空间编码”假设意味着两种编码类型实质上依赖于由更多通用过程(例如视觉空间关注)组成的同一神经网络,但根据确切的任务要求,这些通用过程的权重不同。通过事件相关的功能磁共振成像,我们研究了右撇子男性受试者执行网格/无网格视觉空间工作记忆任务,诱导分类和坐标空间关系编码。我们的数据支持“连续空间编码”假说,这表明,尽管与分类空间关系编码相比,基于相同的额顶枕枕神经网络,坐标空间关系的编码在很大程度上依赖于注意力和执行过程,这可能导致半球差异类似于文献中描述的差异。结果还表明,视觉空间工作记忆由短期后部存储组成,在顶叶和外皮层皮质中最多可容纳三个元素。该存储库取决于可见空间分类的存在,因此可以用于分类空间关系的编码。如果没有给出可见的空间分类,或者必须编码三个以上的元素,则将招募更多的注意力和执行过程,这些过程主要位于背外侧前额叶皮层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号