首页> 外文期刊>Neuropharmacology >NMDA receptors, cognition and schizophrenia - Testing the validity of the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis
【24h】

NMDA receptors, cognition and schizophrenia - Testing the validity of the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis

机译:NMDA受体,认知与精神分裂症-测试NMDA受体功能减退假说的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cognitive dysfunction is core to schizophrenia, and remains poorly treated by existing therapies. A prominent hypothesis suggests that many symptoms arise from N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction. Subsequently, there has emerged a widespread use of many preclinical and clinical NMDAR antagonist models in the search for novel treatments. Clinically, ketamine is broadly purported to induce cognitive symptoms similar to those of schizophrenia. Preclinically, acute, subchronic and neonatal NMDAR antagonist administration models are all utilised in this context, as well as NMDAR transgenic animals. In this review, key strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches are described with regard to their ability to recapitulate the deficits seen in patients. Given the breadth of literature and vogue for research in this topic, instances of NMDAR antagonist effects in the desired domains can readily be found preclinically. However, it is surprisingly difficult to identify any single aspect of cognitive function that possesses complete translational integrity. That is, there does not seem to be an NMDAR antagonist regimen proven to engage NMDARs equivalently in humans and animals that reliably produces the same cognitive effects in each species. This is likely due to the diverse range of techniques and models used by preclinical researchers, a paucity of research describing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of NMDAR antagonist regimens, little capability to measure target engagement, and the lack of harmonized procedures between preclinical and clinical studies. Realizing the potential of the NMDAR hypofunction hypothesis to model cognitive impairment in schizophrenia will require some of these issues to be addressed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Schizophrenia'.
机译:认知功能障碍是精神分裂症的核心,目前的治疗方法仍不能很好地治疗。一个重要的假设表明,许多症状是由N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)功能减退引起的。随后,出现了许多临床前和临床上的NMDAR拮抗剂模型以寻找新的治疗方法。在临床上,氯胺酮被广泛认为可诱发类似于精神分裂症的认知症状。临床前,急性,亚慢性和新生儿NMDAR拮抗剂给药模型以及NMDAR转基因动物均在此背景下使用。在这篇综述中,就这些方法概括患者所见缺陷的能力进行了描述,介绍了每种方法的主要优缺点。考虑到该主题研究的文学和时尚广度,可以在临床前很容易地找到所需域中NMDAR拮抗剂作用的实例。然而,很难识别具有完全翻译完整性的认知功能的任何单个方面。也就是说,似乎没有被证明能在人和动物中等效地参与NMDAR的NMDAR拮抗剂方案,该方案可靠地在每个物种中产生相同的认知作用。这可能是由于临床前研究人员使用的技术和模型种类繁多,描述NMDAR拮抗剂方案的药代动力学与药效学关系的研究很少,测量靶标参与度的能力很小以及临床前和临床研究之间缺乏统一的程序。要实现NMDAR功能低下假说对精神分裂症认知功能障碍进行建模的潜力,就需要解决其中一些问题。本文是《精神分裂症》特刊的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号