首页> 外文期刊>Natural hazards and earth system sciences >Flood frequency analysis supported by the largest historical flood
【24h】

Flood frequency analysis supported by the largest historical flood

机译:最大历史洪水支持的洪水频率分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of non-systematic flood data for statistical purposes depends on the reliability of the assessment of both flood magnitudes and their return period. The earliest known extreme flood year is usually the beginning of the historical record. Even if one properly assesses the magnitudes of historic floods, the problem of their return periods remains unsolved. The matter at hand is that only the largest flood (XM) is known during whole historical period and its occurrence marks the beginning of the historical period and defines its length (L). It is common practice to use the earliest known flood year as the beginning of the record. It means that the L value selected is an empirical estimate of the lower bound on the effective historical lengthM. The estimation of the return period of XM based on its occurrence (L), i.e. M = L, gives a severe upward bias. The problem arises that to estimate the time period (M) representative of the largest observed flood XM.
机译:将非系统性洪水数据用于统计目的取决于洪水幅度及其返回期评估的可靠性。已知最早的极端洪水年份通常是历史记录的开始。即使人们正确地评估了历史性洪水的规模,其重现期的问题仍未解决。目前的问题是,在整个历史时期内只有最大的洪水(XM)是已知的,其发生标志着历史时期的开始并定义了洪水的长度(L)。通常将已知最早的洪水年份用作记录的开始。这意味着所选的L值是有效历史长度M的下限的经验估计。根据XM的出现时间(L)估算XM的返回周期,即M = L,会产生严重的向上偏差。出现的问题是估计代表最大观测洪水XM的时间段(M)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号