首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Relationships between Strong Ground Motion Peak Values and Seismic Loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake
【24h】

Relationships between Strong Ground Motion Peak Values and Seismic Loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake

机译:1999年台湾集集地震期间强地面运动峰值与地震损失之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A better real-time assessment of earthquake effects (i.e. seismic intensity estimation) is crucial for hazard mitigation. Especially during the aftermath of a disastrous event, significant reduction of loss can usually be realized through timely execution of emergency response measures. These effects include strong-ground shaking, ground failure, and their impact on man-made structures. The descriptive Modified Mercalli intensity scale, though still in common use in many poorly instrumented areas ofthe world, is out of date in areas of extensive strong-motion instrumentation. It is desirable to place the earthquake intensity scale on a more quantitative basis based on the actual recorded ground-motion shaking and carefully compiled damage records.In this paper, we investigated the relationships between earthquake loss, intensity and strong motion peak values, mainly based on the Chi-Chi earthquake. Both the strong-motion peak values and the earthquake loss are related. From the results, we foundthat peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak acceleration response spectra at 1 s period (1 s Sa) values are two parameters that give slightly higher correlation coefficients than other parameters for earthquake loss analysis. For intensity estimations,the peak ground velocity (PGV) values and 1 s Sa values are better parameters in the high range and PGA is not stable for smaller earthquakes. Although PGV values give a slightly lower correlation coefficient and larger standard deviation in seismic lossanalysis during the Chi-Chi earthquake, it nevertheless gives more reliable instrumental intensity over a broad magnitude range. 1 s Sa is a good parameter for both seismic losses and intensity evaluation. We thus conclude that PGV and 1 s Sa are relatively more stable in damage assessment and, at least in the high end, in intensity estimation. We shall incorporate these findings in our real-time earthquake rapid reporting and early warning systems.
机译:更好的实时地震影响评估(即地震烈度估算)对于减轻灾害至关重要。特别是在灾难事件发生后,通常可以通过及时执行应急措施来实现损失的大幅减少。这些影响包括强地面震动,地面破坏及其对人造结构的影响。尽管在世界上许多仪器质量较差的地区仍普遍使用描述性的改良式墨卡里强度标度,但在广泛的强运动仪器领域已经过时了。最好根据实际记录的地震动和详细记录的破坏记录,将地震烈度标度更量化。本文主要研究地震损失,烈度与强震峰值之间的关系。在集集地震上。强运动峰值和地震损失都相关。从结果中,我们发现在1 s周期(1 s Sa)值下的峰值地面加速度(PGA)和峰值加速度响应谱是两个参数,与地震损失分析的其他参数相比,它们提供的相关系数略高。对于强度估计,在高范围,峰值地面速度(PGV)值和1 s Sa值是更好的参数,而PGA对于较小的地震不稳定。尽管在Chi-Chi地震中PGV值在地震损失分析中给出的关联系数稍低,标准偏差也较大,但它在较大的震级范围内仍提供了更可靠的仪器强度。 1 s Sa对于地震损失和强度评估都是一个很好的参数。因此,我们得出结论,PGV和1 s Sa在损伤评估中以及至少在高端强度评估中相对更稳定。我们将这些发现纳入我们的实时地震快速报告和预警系统中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号