首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >The importance of prehistoric data and variability of hazard regimes in natural hazard risk assessment - examples from Australia
【24h】

The importance of prehistoric data and variability of hazard regimes in natural hazard risk assessment - examples from Australia

机译:史前数据和灾害制度的可变性在自然灾害风险评估中的重要性-澳大利亚的例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Natural hazards are normally viewed as events that occur randomly over time. This precept usually forms the basis for the development of the hazard magnitude-recurrence interval relationship used in risk assessments. However, hazard variability doesnot always conform to this relationship especially over longer time intervals. Non-stationarity can be common with some hazards and those periods where the variability and/or mean (magnitude/frequency) remain constant are referred to here as hazard regimes. Shifts from one regime to another occur at a variety of time scales from centuries to millennia. Regime shifts are often only discernible by examining longer-term records which usually include prehistoric data. Risk assessments frequently ignore these regime shifts and estimates of the risks associated with tropical cyclones, tsunami, terrestrial floods and landslides in Australia have been both under-estimated and exaggerated when such assessments have been based solely upon short historical records. Examples of these regime shifts and their significance for natural hazard risk assessment are presented here.
机译:通常将自然灾害视为随时间推移随机发生的事件。该戒律通常构成发展风险评估中使用的危害幅度-复发间隔关系的基础。但是,危害可变性并不总是符合这种关系,尤其是在较长的时间间隔内。非平稳性在某些危害中可能很常见,而变异性和/或平均值(幅度/频率)保持恒定的那些时间段在此称为危害状态。从一种政权向另一种政权的转变发生在从几个世纪到几千年的各种时间尺度上。通常只能通过检查通常包含史前数据的长期记录来辨别政权转移。风险评估经常忽略这些制度变化,而仅基于简短的历史记录,对澳大利亚热带气旋,海啸,陆地洪水和山体滑坡相关风险的估计既被低估又被夸大了。这些制度转变的例子及其对自然灾害风险评估的意义在此介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号