...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurological Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal >Prior CSF shunting increases the risk of endoscopic third ventriculostomy failure in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in adults.
【24h】

Prior CSF shunting increases the risk of endoscopic third ventriculostomy failure in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in adults.

机译:先前的CSF分流会增加成人阻塞性脑积水的内镜第三脑室造口术失败的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is accepted as an effective treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus (OHC); however, its benefit in patients previously treated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting remains unclear. The value of concurrent ETV and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting in patients with frequent shunt failure remains unstudied. METHODS: Outcomes were compared between OHC patients receiving ETV as initial CSF diversion treatment (n= 19) versus OHC patients receiving ETV for shunt failure (n= 11) by log-rank analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots of recurrence-free periods. To determine if the performance of ETV with concurrent shunt revision decreased the incidence of catastrophic treatment failure in patients experiencing frequent and emergent shunt failures (n = 8), the time to treatment failure after ETV and shunt revision was compared with the mean duration of their previous CSF shunts. RESULTS: ETV after shunt failure was 2.5-fold more likely to fail [risk ratio (RR): 2.48, p<0.05] versus ETV as initial CSF diversion treatment for OHC. Following ETV as initial CSF diversion treatment, 17 patients (89%) experienced immediate improvement and 65% remained recurrence-free at year 2. Following ETV after shunt failure, 16 patients (71%) experienced immediate improvement, but only 25% remained recurrence-free at year 2. In patients with a history of multiple shunt revisions and complications, concurrent use of ETV and VP shunt did not significantly decrease treatment failure. However, the incidence of catastrophic shunt failure requiring acute intervention decreased (43% versus 17%). CONCLUSION: In our experience with ETV for OHC, prior CSF shunting in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus was associated with the decreased time to treatment failure following conversion to ETV. ETV may be less effective for the treatment of OHC in previously shunted patients. ETV combined with concurrent CSF shunting may be an important strategy to prevent catastrophic treatment failure in OHC patients with a history of multiple shunt revisions and complications.
机译:引言:内镜下第三脑室造口术(ETV)被认为是治疗阻塞性脑积水(OHC)的有效方法。然而,它在先前接受脑脊液分流治疗的患者中的获益尚不清楚。并发ETV和心室腹膜(VP)并发频繁分流失败的患者的价值仍未研究。方法:通过log-rank分析和无复发期的Kaplan-Meier图,比较接受ETV作为初始CSF转移治疗的OHC患者(n = 19)与接受ETV进行分流失败的OHC患者(n = 11)的结果。为了确定并发分流术同时进行ETV的性能是否能降低经历频繁和紧急分流失败(n = 8)的患者的灾难性治疗失败的发生率,将ETV和分流术后的治疗失败时间与其平均持续时间进行比较以前的CSF分流器。结果:分流失败后的ETV失败的可能性比ETV高出2.5倍[风险比(RR):2.48,p <0.05],这是作为OHC初始CSF转移治疗的ETV。以ETV作为最初的CSF转移治疗后,第2年有17例患者(89%)立即好转,并且65%的患者无复发,分流失败后有ETV的患者有16例(71%)患者立即好转,但仅25%复发第2年免费。对于有多次分流翻修和并发症史的患者,同时使用ETV和VP分流并不能显着降低治疗失败率。但是,需要紧急干预的灾难性分流失败的发生率下降了(43%对17%)。结论:根据我们使用ETV进行OHC治疗的经验,阻塞性脑积水患者先前的CSF分流与转换为ETV后治疗失败的时间减少有关。 ETV对先前分流的患者治疗OHC可能无效。 ETV与并发CSF分流术可能是预防具有多次分流术修订和并发症史的OHC患者发生灾难性治疗失败的重要策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号