【24h】

Physiological significance of high- and low-affinity agonist binding to neuronal and recombinant AMPA receptors.

机译:高亲和力和低亲和力激动剂与神经元和重组AMPA受体结合的生理意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Radioligand binding studies have shown that AMPA receptors exist in two variants that differ about twenty-fold in their binding affinities, with brain receptors being mainly of the low-affinity type and recombinantly expressed receptors having almost exclusively high affinity. However, the physiological correlate of high- and low-affinity binding is not yet known. In this study we examined if physiological experiments similarly reveal evidence for two distinct receptor variants. We therefore measured equilibrium desensitization by glutamate and determined IC(50) values for neuronal receptors and for the homomeric receptors GluR1-4 expressed in HEK293 cells. Contrary to the prediction that these IC(50) values exhibit large differences commensurate with those of high- and low-affinity binding, values for homomeric receptors (1-18muM) were on an average not different from those of neuronal receptors (3-10muM). Moreover, simulations with kinetic receptor models suggest that the IC(50) values for neuronal and recombinant receptors correspond to the binding affinity of the low-affinity receptor variant. These findings indicate that the high-affinity binding measured in heterologous expression systems represents an immature receptor variant that does not contribute to the currents recorded from these cells, and that the functional low-affinity receptors are present in such small number that they are effectively masked in binding assays by the high-affinity receptors. Thus, in order to compare experimentally determined saturation binding profiles with those predicted by kinetic receptor models and with dose-response curves from physiological studies, it will be imperative to develop methods for isolating first the low-affinity receptors.
机译:放射性配体结合研究表明,AMPA受体存在两种变体,其结合亲和力相差约二十倍,其中脑受体主要为低亲和力类型,重组表达的受体几乎完全具有高亲和力。但是,尚不知道高亲和力和低亲和力结合的生理相关性。在这项研究中,我们检查了生理实验是否同样揭示了两种不同受体变异的证据。因此,我们通过谷氨酸测量了平衡脱敏,并确定了神经元受体和HEK293细胞中表达的同型受体GluR1-4的IC(50)值。与这些IC(50)值显示出与高亲和力和低亲和力结合量相差较大的预测相反,同型受体(1-18μM)的平均值与神经元受体(3-10μM)的平均值无差异)。此外,动力学受体模型的模拟表明神经元和重组受体的IC(50)值对应于低亲和力受体变体的结合亲和力。这些发现表明,在异源表达系统中测量的高亲和力结合代表了不成熟的受体变体,该变体对从这些细胞记录的电流没有贡献,并且功能性低亲和力受体的存在量很小,它们被有效掩盖了。通过高亲和力受体进行结合测定。因此,为了将实验确定的饱和结合曲线与动力学受体模型预测的饱和结合曲线以及生理学研究的剂量反应曲线进行比较,必须开发出首先分离低亲和力受体的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号