...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurourology and urodynamics. >Clinical diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: reliability of commonly measured parameters and the role of idiopathic detrusor overactivity.
【24h】

Clinical diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: reliability of commonly measured parameters and the role of idiopathic detrusor overactivity.

机译:下尿路症状男性膀胱出口梗阻的临床诊断:常用参数的可靠性和特发性逼尿肌过度活跃的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIMS: There is no generally accepted consensus how to evaluate patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). We have tried to determine whether the most frequently used objective variables as prostate volume, IPS-score, maximum flow rate, residual urine volume, functional bladder capacity, and pressure-flow study are reliable for diagnosis of BOO and we investigated the influence of idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) on this condition. METHODS: A total of 153 men with LUTS and suspected BOO were systematically examined with routine investigation including digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), post-void residual urine volume measurement, uroflowmetry, and pressure-flow study. All patients completed IPS-score. Patients were divided into groups based on Schafer's grade of obstruction and incidence of IDO and clinical and urodynamical variables were compared. RESULTS: At baseline, 45.8% of the patients were urodynamically moderately obstructed and 37.9% were found to be severely obstructed. The grade of obstruction did not correlate with age. Prostate volume, post-void residual volume (PVR), and maximum flow rate correlated significantly with the degree of obstruction. The mean IPS-score remained almost unchanged throughout all obstruction groups. The incidence of IDO was 40.5% and increased from 16% in the minor obstruction group to 38.6% and 53.4% in the moderate and severe obstruction group, respectively. The patients with IDO were older, had larger prostates and were more obstructed. There was no impact of IDO on symptomatology of BOO. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that IPS-score does not achieve sufficient diagnostic accuracy and its role in the assessment of BOO is limited. The grade of obstruction is more related to prostate volume, PVR, and maximum flow rate. BOO and IDO seem to be related and have numerous mutual interactions. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:目的:目前尚无普遍接受的共识,即如何评估提示膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的下尿路症状(LUTS)的患者。我们试图确定最常用的客观变量,例如前列腺体积,IPS评分,最大流速,残余尿量,膀胱功能和压力流量研究是否对BOO的诊断可靠,并研究了特发性疾病的影响在这种情况下逼尿肌过度活动(IDO)。方法:对153名患有LUTS和疑似BOO的男性进行了常规检查,其中包括数字直肠检查,经直肠超声(TRUS),无尿后残留尿量测量,尿流法和压力流研究。所有患者均完成IPS评分。根据Schafer的梗阻等级和IDO发生率将患者分为几组,并对临床和尿动力学参数进行比较。结果:在基线时,尿动力学中度阻塞的患者为45.8%,严重阻塞者为37.9%。阻塞的程度与年龄无关。前列腺体积,排尿后残留量(PVR)和最大流速与阻塞程度显着相关。在所有阻塞组中,平均IPS分数几乎保持不变。 IDO的发生率为40.5%,从轻度阻塞组的16%上升到中度阻塞组和重度阻塞组的38.6%和53.4%。 IDO患者年龄较大,前列腺较大且受阻较大。 IDO对BOO的症状没有影响。结论:这些数据表明IPS评分不能达到足够的诊断准确性,并且其在BOO评估中的作用是有限的。阻塞的程度与前列腺体积,PVR和最大流速有关。 BOO和IDO似乎是相关的,并且具有许多相互的相互作用。版权所有2003 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号