...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurourology and urodynamics. >Quantification of changes in detrusor function and pressure-flow parameters after radical prostatectomy: Relation to postoperative continence status and the impact of intensity of pelvic floor muscle exercises
【24h】

Quantification of changes in detrusor function and pressure-flow parameters after radical prostatectomy: Relation to postoperative continence status and the impact of intensity of pelvic floor muscle exercises

机译:前列腺癌根治术后逼尿肌功能和压力流参数变化的量化:与术后自控状态和骨盆底肌肉运动强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: We aim to quantify changes in detrusor function and pressure-flow parameters after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and to determine the impact of the level of intensity of pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) on these changes. We also tried to identify preoperative urodynamic factors, predictive of postoperative continence status. Methods: Sixty-six patients were included in the study. An urodynamic examination was performed before surgery and 26 weeks after catheter removal. All patients were instructed in PFME. However the intensity of PFME varied between instructions based on an information folder only (F-PFME) and intensive guidance by a physiotherapist, in addition to the folder (PG-PFME). Results: In 66 men pre- as well as postoperative urodynamic studies were available for analysis. Overall, Q max increased, p det.Qmax and the urethral resistance factor URA decreased significantly after surgery. At baseline, detrusor overactivity (DOA) was found in 34% and 5.3% of the men who were still incontinent 6 months postoperatively and those who regained continence, respectively (P = 0.015). Postoperatively, Q max was significantly higher (P = 0.04) and URA significantly lower (P = 0.047) in the physiotherapist-guided group. No prognostic standard urodynamic factors for post-RP incontinence (PRPI) were identified. Conclusion: In univariate analysis, preoperative DOA is associated with a higher risk of remaining incontinent after surgery. However, in multivariate analysis, urodynamic parameters predictive of PRPI could not be identified. Therefore, standard preoperative filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies seem to have no role as preoperative predictors of PRPI in patients with localized prostate cancer. More intensive PFME might have a lowering effect on bladder outflow resistance after RRP.
机译:目的:我们旨在量化根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)后逼尿肌功能和压力流量参数的变化,并确定骨盆底肌肉运动强度(PFME)对这些变化的影响。我们还试图确定术前尿动力学因素,以预测术后尿失禁状况。方法:66例患者被纳入研究。术前和拔除导管后26周进行尿动力学检查。所有患者均接受PFME指导。但是,PFME的强度在仅基于信息文件夹(F-PFME)的指令和物理治疗师除文件夹(PG-PFME)的密集指导的指示之间有所不同。结果:在66名男性中,术前和术后尿动力学研究可供分析。总体而言,手术后Q max升高,p det.Q max和尿道阻力因子URA显着降低。在基线时,分别在术后6个月仍失禁的男性和重新获得失禁的男性中发现逼尿肌过度活动(DOA)的比例分别为34%和5.3%(P = 0.015)。物理治疗师指导的组术后Qmax显着较高(P = 0.04),URA显着较低(P = 0.047)。尚未确定RP后尿失禁(PRPI)的预后标准尿流动力学因素。结论:在单因素分析中,术前DOA与术后残留失禁的较高风险有关。但是,在多变量分析中,无法确定预测PRPI的尿动力学参数。因此,标准的术前充盈性膀胱测压法和压力流研究似乎没有作为局限性前列腺癌患者术前PRPI的预测指标。强化PFME可能会降低RRP后的膀胱流出阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号