首页> 外文期刊>Biological Control: Theory and Application in Pest Management >Using entomopathogenic nematodes for biological control of plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar: effects of irrigation and species in apple orchards.
【24h】

Using entomopathogenic nematodes for biological control of plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar: effects of irrigation and species in apple orchards.

机译:利用昆虫病原线虫对李子库蚊(Conotrachelus nenuphar)进行生物防治:苹果园中灌溉和物种的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar, is a major pest of stone and pome fruit (e.g., apples, pears, peaches, cherries, etc.). Entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema spp. and Heterorhabditis spp.) are virulent to ground-dwelling stages of C. nenuphar and may be incorporated into an integrated management strategy. Two significant questions that must be addressed prior to implementation are: (1) which nematode is most effective in suppressing the target pest under field conditions? and (2) what is the impact of various irrigation levels on field efficacy? We addressed these questions by comparing the efficacy of two nematodes, Steinernema riobrave and Steinernema feltiae (two nematodes that showed the highest virulence in prior lab assays and field trials) and an untreated control, at three irrigation levels 0, 1 and 6 irrigation events applied during a two-week period post-application. C. nenuphar larvae were added to mini-plots prior to treatment application. Treatment effects were assessed by comparing the number of C. nenuphar adults emerging from each plot. The experiments were conducted at two field sites (apple orchards in Kearneysville, West Virginia and Belchertown, Massachusetts) in 2011 and 2012. Relative to the untreated check, S. riobrave caused 85.0% and 97.3% control in 2011 and 2012 in Massachusetts (respectively) and 100% control in West Virginia both years, whereas S. feltiae caused 0% and 84.6% control in 2011 and 2012 (respectively) in Massachusetts, and 78.2% and 69.7% control in West Virginia. The level of C. nenuphar suppression caused by S. riobrave was higher than suppression by S. feltiae at both sites in 2011 (no differences were detected in 2012). Irrigation did not have a significant effect on C. nenuphar suppression at both sites and in both years of the experiments. The lack of irrigation effects is an unusual finding for field applications using entomopathogenic nematodes, and may have been due to the level of precipitation and water-holding capacity in the field soils tested. The results of this study have positive implications for the potential of incorporating entomopathogenic nematodes into a C. nenuphar management program.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.020
机译:李子(Conotrachelus nenuphar)是一种主要的核果和梨果害虫(例如,苹果,梨,桃子,樱桃等)。昆虫病原线虫(Steinernema spp。和Heterorhabditis spp。)对C. nenuphar的地面居住阶段具有毒性,可以纳入综合管理策略。在实施之前必须解决的两个重要问题是:(1)哪种线虫在田间条件下最有效地抑制目标有害生物? (2)各种灌溉水平对田间功效有何影响?我们通过比较两种线虫0、1和6的灌溉事件,通过比较两个线虫Steinernema riobrave和Steinernema thinkiae(两个线虫在先前的实验室测定和田间试验中显示出最高的毒性)和未经处理的对照的功效,解决了这些问题。在申请后的两周内。在处理前,将C. nenuphar幼虫添加到微型图中。通过比较每个小区出现的C. nenuphar成虫的数量来评估治疗效果。该实验于2011年和2012年在两个野外地点(西弗吉尼亚州科尔尼斯维尔的苹果园和马萨诸塞州的Belchertown)进行。相对于未经处理的检查,S。riobrave在马萨诸塞州的2011年和2012年分别控制了85.0%和97.3%的控制(分别)和西弗吉尼亚州的100%控制率,而在2011年和2012年,毡状葡萄球菌分别引起了0%和84.6%的控制,而西弗吉尼亚州则分别控制了78.2%和69.7%。 2011年,在两个地点,由里氏链球菌引起的C. nenuphar抑制水平均高于毡状葡萄球菌的抑制水平(2012年未发现差异)。在两个地点和两个实验年中,灌溉均对C. nenuphar抑制没有显着影响。对于使用昆虫病原线虫的田间应用,缺乏灌溉效果是一个不寻常的发现,并且可能是由于所测试的田间土壤中的降水量和持水量所致。这项研究的结果对于将昆虫病原线虫整合到C.nenuphar管理程序中具有潜在的积极意义。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.020

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号