首页> 外文期刊>Neonatology >Higher rate of cord-related adverse events in neonates with dry umbilical cord care compared to chlorhexidine powder. Results of a randomized controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of chlorhexidine powder versus dry care in umbilical cord care of the newborn.
【24h】

Higher rate of cord-related adverse events in neonates with dry umbilical cord care compared to chlorhexidine powder. Results of a randomized controlled study to compare efficacy and safety of chlorhexidine powder versus dry care in umbilical cord care of the newborn.

机译:与洗必泰粉相比,干脐带护理新生儿的脐带相关不良事件发生率更高。一项随机对照研究的结果,用于比较氯己定粉末与干护理在新生儿脐带护理中的功效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Best practice for umbilical cord care (UC) still remains controversial in developed countries with aseptic perinatal care. A bicenter randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CX) powder versus dry cord care (DC) for UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All neonates of two neonatal care units were invited to take part in the study. Participants were randomized to either DC or UC with CX powder (0.1%). Primary study outcome was the cord separation time. Secondary outcomes were omphalitis, granuloma of the umbilical ground, adverse events and parents' treatment satisfaction. The outcome parameters were documented at a hospital-located study visit 10-14 days after birth. RESULTS: 669 neonates were enrolled in the trial. 337 were randomized to receive CX powder for umbilical cord care, 332 to DC. Cord separation time was 7.0 +/- 2.5 days in CX-treated neonates and 7.8 +/- 2.9 days in DC (p < 0.001). There were 9 cases of omphalitis, 2 in the CX group, 7 in the DC group (p = 0.1). No difference in the occurrence of umbilical granuloma between the treatment regimens was detected. Neonates randomized to CX were less likely to have an adverse event (140 in 109 subjects vs. 205 in 149 subjects in the DC neonates; p = 0.001). Half of these adverse events were cord-related. Neonates randomized to DC had nearly twice as many cord-related adverse events as those with CX treatment (CX: 58 in 54 patients vs. DC: 110 in 97 patients; p < 0.001). Parents' treatment satisfaction was significantly higher in the neonates with CX cord care. CONCLUSIONS: Cord-related adverse events in neonatal umbilical cord care remain a clinical issue. Even in an aseptic birth context in a developed country, cord care with CX powder showed a reduction of cord-related adverse events.
机译:目的:脐带护理(UC)的最佳实践在具有无菌围产期护理的发达国家中仍存在争议。进行了一项双中心随机临床试验,以评估氯己定(CX)粉末相对于干脐带护理(DC)的疗效。患者和方法:邀请两个新生儿护理部门的所有新生儿参加研究。用CX粉末(0.1%)将参与者随机分为DC或UC。主要研究结果为脐带分离时间。次要结局为脐炎,脐带肉芽肿,不良事件和父母的治疗满意度。出生后10-14天在医院进行的一项研究访问中记录了结果参数。结果:669名新生儿参加了试验。 337例患者被随机分配接受CX粉末,用于脐带护理,332例DC。在接受CX治疗的新生儿中,脐带分离时间为7.0 +/- 2.5天,而在DC中为7.8 +/- 2.9天(p <0.001)。眼炎9例,CX组2例,DC组7例(p = 0.1)。在两种治疗方案之间未发现脐带肉芽肿的发生差异。随机分配至CX的新生儿发生不良事件的可能性较小(109名受试者中有140名,而DC新生儿中149名受试者中有205名; p = 0.001)。这些不良事件中有一半与脐带相关。随机分配至DC的新生儿发生与脐带相关的不良事件的人数几乎是接受CX治疗者的两倍(CX:54例,58例; DC:97例,110例; p <0.001)。在接受CX脐带护理的新生儿中,父母的治疗满意度明显更高。结论:新生儿脐带护理中与脐带相关的不良事件仍然是临床问题。即使在发达国家无菌出生的情况下,用CX粉末进行脐带护理也可以减少与脐带相关的不良事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号