...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Treatment Reviews >The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review.
【24h】

The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review.

机译:内镜和非内镜治疗早期食管癌的安全性和有效性:系统评价。

获取原文

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0-IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies. RESULTS: The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments. DISCUSSION: Based on findings from this review, there is no single "best practice" approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.
机译:简介:传统上,早期癌症的治疗(0-IIA期)包括单独或与化学疗法和/或放射疗法相结合的食管切除术。最近为改善疗效并最大程度减少副作用而进行的努力集中在微创内窥镜治疗上,这种治疗可在不损害健康组织的情况下去除病变。这篇综述评估了它们相对于早期食管癌的传统非内镜治疗的安全性和有效性。方法:使用Cochrane指南对同行评审研究进行系统的回顾。搜索书目数据库以识别过去三年中发表的相关英语语言研究,包括:PubMed(即MEDLINE和其他资源),EMBASE,CINAHL,Cochrane图书馆,英国评论与传播中心(NHS EED,DARE和HTA)数据库,EconLit和Web of Science。还搜索了专业协会,相关癌症组织,临床实践指南和临床试验的网站。两名独立的评审员从研究中选择,严格评估并提取信息。结果:审查包括75项研究,涉及3124例患者和10种治疗形式。大多数研究是短期的,没有比较性。与非内窥镜技术研究相比,内窥镜技术研究报告的不良事件相似且意义不大。相对于其他内窥镜技术,光动力疗法(PDT)的完全缓解率略低,这可能是由于研究之间患者群体的差异。没有研究比较接受内镜治疗的患者与未接受内镜治疗的患者的总生存率或特定原因生存率。讨论:基于本次审查的结果,没有单一的“最佳实践”方法来治疗早期食道癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号