首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein for dialysis vascular access in uremic patients.
【24h】

Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein for dialysis vascular access in uremic patients.

机译:超声引导颈内静脉插管以透析尿毒症患者的血管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: A reliable temporary vascular access is always required for hemodialysis when a permanent vascular access is not available. However, techniques for creating temporary vascular accesses remain imperfect. This study utilized the 'SiteRite' ultrasound device to improve both success and complication rates of jugular venous cannulation for temporary access. METHODS: This prospective, comparative study recruited 104 uremic patients receiving ultrasound-guided and 86 patients undergoing landmark-guided percutaneous internal jugular venous cannulation of dual-lumen dialysis catheters. Success rate, number of puncture attempts, access time, and the complication rate of the ultrasound technique, in comparison with the landmark-guided technique, were studied. RESULTS: The ultrasound-guided cannulation was superior to the external landmark-guided cannulation in overall success rate (99.0 vs. 86.0%, p < 0.01), success rate of the first puncture attempt (80.8 vs. 34.9%, p < 0.01), average puncture (access) times (15.8 vs. 43.7 s, p < 0.01), puncture trials (1.39 vs. 2.58, p < 0.01), and traumatic complication rate (1.9 vs. 1 1.6%, p = 0.015). The incidence of infective complications for the ultrasound group was not different from that of the landmark-guided groups (2.9 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.589). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-guided technique offers both safety and convenience in inserting jugular venous dialysis catheters. It represents a valuable technique in creating temporary dialysis hemoaccesses.
机译:背景:在无法获得永久性血管通路的情况下,血液透析始终需要可靠的临时性血管通路。但是,用于创建临时血管通路的技术仍然不完善。这项研究利用“ SiteRite”超声设备提高了颈静脉插管的临时手术成功率和并发症发生率。方法:这项前瞻性,比较性研究招募了104名接受超声引导的尿毒症患者,以及86例接受了双管腔透析导管的经地标引导的经皮颈内静脉插管的患者。与路标引导技术相比,研究了超声技术的成功率,穿刺尝试次数,进入时间和并发症发生率。结果:超声引导插管的总成功率(99.0 vs. 86.0%,p <0.01),首次穿刺尝试的成功率(80.8 vs. 34.9%,p <0.01)优于外部标志引导插管。 ,平均穿刺(进入)时间(15.8 vs. 43.7 s,p <0.01),穿刺试验(1.39 vs. 2.58,p <0.01)和创伤并发症发生率(1.9 vs. 1 1.6%,p = 0.015)。超声组的感染并发症发生率与路标指导组的感染并发症发生率没有差异(2.9比2.3%,p = 0.589)。结论:超声引导技术在插入颈静脉透析导管时既安全又方便。它代表了创建临时透析血液通路的一种有价值的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号