首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >Vascular Access-Related Bloodstream Infections in First Nations, Community and Teaching Canadian Dialysis Units, and Other Centre-Level Predictors
【24h】

Vascular Access-Related Bloodstream Infections in First Nations, Community and Teaching Canadian Dialysis Units, and Other Centre-Level Predictors

机译:原住民,社区和教学加拿大透析部门以及其他中心水平预测因素中与血管通路相关的血液感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: Vascular access-related bloodstream infection (BSI) is frequent among patients undergoing hemodialysis increasing their morbidity and mortality, but its occurrence across various dialysis centre types is not known. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence rates and assess the variability in BSI risk between dialysis centre types and other centre-level variables. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 621 patients initiating hemodialysis in 7 Canadian dialysis centres. Cox regression models, where access type was continuously updated, were used to identify predictors of BSI occurrence. Results: During follow-up of the cohort (median age 68.1 years, 41.7% female, and 76.7% initiating with a central venous catheter, CVC), 73 patients had a BSI (rate: 0.21/1000 person-days). The BSI risk was not different in First Nation units (adjusted relative risk: 0.47,95% confidence interval: 0.06-3.72) and teach-ing hospitals (1.33,0.70-2.54) compared to community hospitals. No other centre-related variables were associated with the risk of BSI. Conclusion: We did not find differences in the BSI risk among dialysis unit types, or any other centre-related variables. The rates of BSI in our population were lower than those observed in other settings, but the high proportion of patients using CVCs is concerning.
机译:背景/目的:在进行血液透析的患者中,血管通路相关的血流感染(BSI)很常见,从而增加了发病率和死亡率,但是在各种透析中心类型中其发生情况尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是描述发病率并评估透析中心类型与其他中心水平变量之间的BSI风险差异。方法:我们对加拿大7个透析中心的621例开始血液透析的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。使用访问类型不断更新的Cox回归模型来确定BSI发生的预测因素。结果:在该队列的随访期间(中位年龄为68.1岁,女性为41.7%,而中央静脉导管CVC起始率为76.7%),有73例患者发生了BSI(发生率:0.21 / 1000人日)。与社区医院相比,原住民单位(调整后的相对风险:0.47,95%置信区间:0.06-3.72)和教学医院的BSI风险没有差异(1.33,0.70-2.54)。没有其他与中心相关的变量与BSI的风险相关。结论:我们没有发现透析单位类型或任何其他中心相关变量之间的BSI风险差异。在我们的人群中,BSI的发生率低于其他情况,但是使用CVC的患者比例很高令人担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号