首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >A comparison of the predictive performance of different methods of kidney function estimation in a well-characterized HIV-infected population.
【24h】

A comparison of the predictive performance of different methods of kidney function estimation in a well-characterized HIV-infected population.

机译:在特征明确的HIV感染人群中,不同肾功能评估方法的预测性能的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equations have never been validated in the HIV population. This pilot study aimed to compare all currently available methods of kidney function assessment with nuclear GFR in HIV-infected adults. METHODS: Patients underwent GFR measurement with (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99m Pentetate), and measured values were compared with results of creatinine-based estimation equations [abbreviated 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formulae], 24-hour urine creatinine clearance and estimated cystatin C GFR. RESULTS: Twenty-seven HIV-infected adults were studied. Most were male and Caucasian, with a mean age of 52 years. Median CD4 was 290 cells/mm(3), 70% of patients had HIV RNA <50 copies/ml and all were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (median 5 drugs). Median Tc-99m Pentetate-GFR was 91 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Despite greater bias and similar accuracy, the MDRD formula was more precise than the CG formula, regardless of whether CG estimations were corrected for ideal body weight or body surface area. Relative accuracy within 30% of nuclear GFR was greater for the MDRD formula than for all other methods. The performance of 24-hour urine creatinine clearance was similar to that of the MDRD formula for patients with GFR <90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), although it performed less well at higher GFR. The performance of cystatin C GFR was inferior to that of all the creatinine-based methods. CONCLUSIONS: While no method of kidney function estimation performed highly, both 24-hour urine creatinine clearance and the MDRD formula performed with a level of precision and accuracy sufficient for clinical decision making. Our findings support the preferential use of the MDRD formula in the treated HIV population and suggest that there are no HIV-specific factors that limit equation applicability. Larger validation studies are needed to confirm our findings and allow generalization to the HIV population at large.
机译:背景:肾小球滤过率(GFR)估计方程从未在HIV人群中得到验证。这项前瞻性研究旨在比较HIV感染成年人中所有当前可用的肾功能评估方法与核GFR。方法:用(99m)Tc-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸(Tc-99m戊酸)对患者进行GFR测量,并将测量值与基于肌酐的估计方程式的结果进行比较[肾脏病饮食的简化四变量修改(MDRD)公式和Cockcroft-Gault(CG)公式],24小时尿肌酐清除率和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C GFR估计值。结果:对27名HIV感染的成年人进行了研究。大多数是男性和高加索人,平均年龄为52岁。 CD4的中位数为290细胞/ mm(3),70%的患者HIV RNA <50拷贝/ ml,所有患者均接受高活性抗逆转录病毒疗法(中位数5种药物)。 Tc-99m戊酸GFR的中位数为91 ml / min / 1.73 m(2)。尽管存在更大的偏差和相似的准确性,但无论是否针对理想体重或体表面积校正了CG估计值,MDRD公式都比CG公式更精确。 MDRD公式在核GFR的30%以内的相对准确度高于所有其他方法。对于GFR <90 ml / min / 1.73 m(2)的患者,24小时尿肌酐清除率的表现与MDRD公式相似,尽管在较高的GFR下表现较差。胱抑素C GFR的性能不及所有基于肌酐的方法。结论:虽然没有一项肾功能评估方法能很好地执行,但24小时尿肌酐清除率和MDRD公式的执行水平均足以满足临床决策的要求。我们的发现支持在治疗的HIV人群中优先使用MDRD公式,并表明没有特定于HIV的因素限制方程的适用性。需要更大的验证研究来确认我们的发现,并允许将其推广到整个HIV人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号