首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >Haemodiafiltration does not reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotensive episodes when compared to cooled high-flux haemodialysis.
【24h】

Haemodiafiltration does not reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotensive episodes when compared to cooled high-flux haemodialysis.

机译:与冷却的高通量血液透析相比,血液透析滤过不会降低透析内降压发作的频率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Intradialytic hypotension remains the commonest complication of outpatient haemodialysis (HD) treatments. On-line haemodiafiltration (HDF) has been reported to reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotension. We introduced on-line HDF into our satellite dialysis program, and prospectively audited the effect of HDF on cardiovascular stability. METHODS: 34 patients' dialysis schedules (Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday) were converted to online post-dilutional HDF, and 44 patients' dialysis schedules (Monday/Wednesday/Friday) remained on high-flux HD. Blood pressure and intra-treatment complications were monitored prospectively for 12 months. RESULTS: There was no significant change in pre-treatment mean arterial blood pressure in the HDF group during the 12 months of the study (pre-treatment 113.7 +/- 0.7 mm Hg vs. 109.3 +/- 2.8 after 12 months), or for the HD cohort (113.9 +/- 2.7 vs. 117.9 +/- 2.6). However, the frequency of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was greater for the HDF cohort: 25.9 versus 16.5% in the HD cohort, p = 0.0116. During HDF, on average >16 litres of substitution fluid was used and the median temperature was 36 degrees C (35 degrees C-36 degrees C), higher than the dialysate in the HD cohort which was 35 degrees C (35 degrees C-36 degrees C), p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In this study, HDF did not improve blood pressure control or reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotensive episodes compared to high-flux HD using cooled dialysate.
机译:简介:透析内低血压仍然是门诊血液透析(HD)治疗的最常见并发症。在线血液透析滤过(HDF)可以减少透析内低血压的频率。我们将在线HDF引入了我们的卫星透析计划,并前瞻性地评估了HDF对心血管稳定性的影响。方法:将34例患者的透析时间表(周二/周四/周六)转换为在线稀释后HDF,而44例患者的透析时间表(周一/周三/周五)仍采用高通量HD。对血压和治疗中并发症进行前瞻性监测,为期12个月。结果:在研究的12个月中,HDF组的治疗前平均动脉血压无明显变化(治疗前113.7 +/- 0.7 mm Hg与12个月后109.3 +/- 2.8),或HD群组(113.9 +/- 2.7与117.9 +/- 2.6)。但是,HDF人群透析内降压发作的频率更高:HD人群为25.9,而HD人群为16.5%,p = 0.0116。在HDF期间,平均使用> 16升替代液,中位温度为36摄氏度(35摄氏度至36摄氏度),高于HD队列中的透析液的35摄氏度(35摄氏度至36摄氏度) ℃),p <0.05。结论:在本研究中,与使用冷却透析液的高通量HD相比,HDF不能改善血压控制或降低透析内降压发作的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号