...
首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association >Cost effectiveness of the interferon-?? release assay for tuberculosis screening of hemodialysis patients
【24h】

Cost effectiveness of the interferon-?? release assay for tuberculosis screening of hemodialysis patients

机译:干扰素的成本效益血液透析患者的结核病筛查释放试验;

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. The incidence of tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection in hemodialysis patients is higher than that in the general population. Our aim was to assess the cost effectiveness of QuantiFERON?-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) compared with the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the chest x-ray examination (CXR) for tuberculosis screening of hemodialysis patients. Methods. Markov models were constructed using a societal perspective on the lifetime horizon. The target population was a hypothetical cohort of 40-year-old hemodialysis patients. All costs and clinical benefits were discounted at a fixed annual rate of 3%. Three strategies QFT, TST and CXR were modeled. Results. In the base-case analysis, QFT yielded the greatest benefits at the lowest cost [US$7694.43; 4.19 258 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] compared with the TST (US$9337.81; 4.18 543 QALYs) and CXR (US$12 951.36; 4.14 821 QALYs) (year 2012 values). The cost effectiveness was sensitive to the the Bacillus Calmette Gu??rin (BCG) vaccination rate. The TST strategy was more cost effective than the QFT strategy at the willingness-to-pay level of US$50 000/QALY gained when the rate of BCG vaccination was 0.18 or lower. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of 40-year-old patients by Monte Carlo simulations for 10 000 trials demonstrated that the QFT was the most cost effective with a value of 100% at all willingness-to-pay levels compared with TST and CXR. Conclusion. sThe QFT is the most cost-effective method for the tuberculosis screening of hemodialysis patients. Interferon-?? release assays should be recommended in clinical practice on the basis of their cost effectiveness, as well as their higher specificity, compared with TST and CXR. ? The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.
机译:背景。血液透析患者的结核病和潜伏性结核感染的发生率高于一般人群。我们的目的是评估QuantiFERON?-TB黄金管(QFT)与结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和胸部X线检查(CXR)进行血液透析患者结核病筛查的成本效益。方法。马尔可夫模型是基于社会视角来构建的。目标人群是40岁血液透析患者的假设队列。所有费用和临床收益均以每年3%的固定比率折现。对三种策略QFT,TST和CXR进行了建模。结果。在基本案例分析中,QFT以最低的成本获得了最大的收益[7694.43美元; 4.19 258个质量调整生命年(QALYs)]与TST(9337.81美元; 4.18 543 QALYs)和CXR(12 951.36美元; 4.14 821 QALYs)(2012年值)相比。成本效益对卡介苗芽孢杆菌(BCG)的疫苗接种率敏感。当卡介苗接种率为0.18或更低时,在支付意愿为50000美元/ QALY的情况下,TST策略比QFT策略更具成本效益。通过蒙特卡洛模拟进行的10 000个试验的40岁患者的成本-效果可接受性曲线表明,与TST和CXR相比,QFT在所有支付意愿下的成本效益最高,值为100%。结论。 sQFT是对血液透析患者进行结核病筛查的最具成本效益的方法。干扰素与TST和CXR相比,应在临床实践中基于其成本效益以及更高的特异性来推荐释放试验。 ?作者2012。由牛津大学出版社代表ERA-EDTA出版。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号