首页> 外文期刊>Cancer reviews >Immunomodulatory Antibody Therapy of Cancer: The Closer, the Better
【24h】

Immunomodulatory Antibody Therapy of Cancer: The Closer, the Better

机译:癌症的免疫调节抗体疗法:越近越好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Immune checkpoint blockade therapies have demonstrated promising therapeutic effects; however, clinical outcomes are variable, with only a subgroup of cancer patients achieving durable complete responses. New therapeutic strategies, including local administration of immunomodulatory antibodies, have been considered as better routes for improving the overall efficacy of antibody-based therapy. In this issue of Clinical Cancer Research, Dai and colleagues (1] report that locally delivering combinations of immunomodulatory antibodies completely eradicates larger tumors in three murine tumor models. In the same issue, Mangsbo and colleagues (2) report that local injection of CD40 agonistic antibody to activate dendritic cells (DC) significantly suppresses tumor growth. Both preclinical observations suggest that a local route to deliver immunomodulatory antibodies with different mechanisms of action could be a better way to initiate, enhance, and maintain a strong local antitumor T-cell response. Both reports also demonstrate that intratumoral injection of immunomodulatory antibodies not only elicits rejection of local tumors but also results in systemic protective immunity against distant tumors or a rechallenge with the same tumors. The search for an optimal route of delivery of cancer immu-notherapy agents has been a research focus since Coley's first clinical attempt of injecting mixed bacterial toxin into primary tumor tissues. At that time, intratumoral injection was considered by Coley to be crucial to a patient's survival (3). Since then, local delivery of immunotherapy agents, such as vaccines and adjuvants, has been the main route of immunotherapy administration for decades. However, in the 1980s, the use of IL2 in patients with melanoma and renal tumors changed the landscape of cancer therapy. As researchers realized that a strong systemic antitumor immune response could eventually not only reject local tumors but also prevent tumor metastasis, intravenous injection of immunomodulatory agents remained a major route of cancer immunotherapy until now. However, some limitations of systemic delivery have been identified. For example, it is unknown to what extent systemically delivered therapeutic agents eventually accumulate at the tumor sites.
机译:免疫检查站封锁疗法已显示出可喜的治疗效果。然而,临床结果是可变的,只有一小部分癌症患者获得了持久的完全反应。新的治疗策略,包括局部施用免疫调节抗体,被认为是改善基于抗体的治疗总体功效的更好途径。在本期《临床癌症研究》中,Dai及其同事(1)报告说,局部递送免疫调节抗体组合可完全根除三种鼠类肿瘤模型中的较大肿瘤; Mangsbo及其同事(2)报告说,局部注射CD40激动剂激活树突状细胞(DC)的抗体可显着抑制肿瘤的生长。两项临床前观察均表明,以不同的作用机制递送局部免疫调节抗体的局部途径可能是引发,增强和维持强烈的局部抗肿瘤T细胞反应的更好方法。这两份报告还表明,肿瘤内注射免疫调节抗体不仅会引起局部肿瘤排斥,而且还会导致针对远处肿瘤或对相同肿瘤的再攻击具有全身保护性免疫力。自Coley首次进行inje临床尝试以来,一直是研究重点将细菌毒素混合到原发性肿瘤组织中。当时,Coley认为瘤内注射对患者的生存至关重要(3)。从那时起,数十年来,局部递送免疫治疗剂(例如疫苗和佐剂)一直是免疫治疗管理的主要途径。然而,在1980年代,在黑素瘤和肾肿瘤患者中使用IL2改变了癌症治疗的前景。研究人员意识到,强大的全身性抗肿瘤免疫反应最终不仅可以排斥局部肿瘤,而且可以预防肿瘤转移,迄今为止,静脉注射免疫调节剂仍是癌症免疫治疗的主要途径。但是,已经确定了全身递送的一些局限性。例如,尚不清楚全身递送的治疗剂最终在肿瘤部位积累到何种程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号