首页> 外文期刊>Nature + culture >Whose Utopia? Our Utopia! Competing Visions of the Future at the UN Climate Talks
【24h】

Whose Utopia? Our Utopia! Competing Visions of the Future at the UN Climate Talks

机译:谁的乌托邦?我们的乌托邦!联合国气候谈判对未来的异象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social movements move and grow by autopoesis-by calling their prospective ranks to order using public pronouncements replete with consequential assumptions about the world as they see it. In the same way, governing bodies and vested economic interests stake out opposing public positions. In the wake of the crucial international climate negotiations in Paris, December 2015, at which the nations adopted the first truly universal climate treaty, we look back over five years of participatory ethnographic research inside the UN climate talks and the social movements for climate justice, identifying key lifeworld assumptions inscribed in the public position-taking of central economic, public, and political sphere actors. Our findings include grounds for skepticism that UN climate policy can transcend the power of the fossil fuel companies to attenuate both international ambitions and national contributions to the universal effort, but also an exciting possibility that climate justice philosophy and tactics, aided by bold counter-spectacle techniques from the Occupy movement, might return to the stage in the coming years and lead the necessary deep culture shift that decarbonization will require.
机译:社会运动通过自动验尸法来移动和发展-通过使用公开声明称呼他们的预期等级来充实他们所看到的关于世界的相应假设。同样,理事机构和既得的经济利益也压制了反对的公共立场。在各国于2015年12月在巴黎举行了至关重要的国际气候谈判之后,各国通过了第一份真正的普遍性气候条约,我们回顾了联合国气候谈判和气候正义社会运动中超过五年的参与式人种学研究,确定中央经济,公共和政治领域参与者的公共立场中所刻画的重要生活世界假设。我们的发现包括对联合国气候政策能否超越化石燃料公司削弱国际野心和国家对普遍努力的贡献的怀疑持怀疑态度的依据,但也有令人振奋的可能性,即气候正义理念和策略在大胆的反响的帮助下占领运动的技术可能会在未来几年重返舞台,并引发脱碳所需的必要的深层文化转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号