首页> 外文期刊>NACTA Journal >Testing the Efficacy of Reverse Learning as a Teaching and Learning Method Using an Interactive Multimedia Computer Program
【24h】

Testing the Efficacy of Reverse Learning as a Teaching and Learning Method Using an Interactive Multimedia Computer Program

机译:使用交互式多媒体计算机程序测试反向学习作为一种教学方法的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A Computer Interactive Multimedia Program for Learning Enhancement (CIMPLE) program was developed to enhance learning in an introductory agronomy course at Iowa State University. CIMPLE includes learner objectives, digitized tutorial video, key concepts, practice learning exercises, and self diagnostic quizzes. The self-assessment components are for students to quiz themselves over material presumably after having studied the material. Several students however started with the learning assessment programs, to test their initial level of understanding of material before studying, a process coined "reverse learning." To assess the concept of reverse learning, students were divided into one of three learning strategies: 1) students used the textbook, did not use CIMPLE and then took graded quizzes; 2) students used CIMPLE and the textbookand then took the graded quizzes; and 3) students first did the non-graded self-assessments on CIMPLE, then used CIMPLE and the text, and then took the graded quizzes (reverse learning). There was no significant grade difference across the three learningstrategies. Grade performance was not influenced by learning style regardless of learning strategy. Students with different learning styles within a learning strategy had similar grade performance. While our results do not show that reverse learning isstatistically better than the other learning strategies we tested, they do show that students using that strategy learn, on average, as well students using more traditional strategies.
机译:在爱荷华州立大学的农学入门课程中,开发了计算机交互式多媒体程序以增强学习能力(CIMPLE)。 CIMPLE包括学习者目标,数字化教程视频,关键概念,实践学习练习和自我诊断测验。自我评估的组成部分是供学生在学习材料后对材料进行测验。然而,一些学生从学习评估程序开始,以测试他们对学习之前的材料的初步理解水平,这一过程被称为“逆向学习”。为了评估反向学习的概念,将学生分为三种学习策略之一:1)学生使用课本,不使用CIMPLE,然后参加测验; 2)学生使用CIMPLE和教科书,然后进行分级测验; 3)学生首先对CIMPLE进行非分级的自我评估,然后使用CIMPLE和课文,然后进行分级测验(反向学习)。三种学习策略的年级差异均无统计学意义。不论学习策略如何,年级表现均不受学习方式的影响。在学习策略中具有不同学习风格的学生具有相似的年级表现。虽然我们的结果并未表明逆向学习在统计学上比我们测试的其他学习策略要好,但它们确实表明,使用该策略的学生平均会学习,而使用更传统的策略的学生也会学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号