How does initial treatment choice affect short-term and long-term costs for clinically localized prostate cancer?

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data regarding costs of prostate cancer treatment are scarce. This study investigates how initial treatment choice affects short-term and long-term costs. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study followed prostate-cancer cases diagnosed in 2000 for 5 years using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Men age>/=66 years, in Medicare fee for service, diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in 2000 while residing in a SEER region, were matched to noncancer controls using age, sex, race, region, comorbidity, and survival. On the basis of treatment received during the first 9 months postdiagnosis, patients were assigned to watchful waiting, radiation, hormonal therapy, hormonal+radiation, and surgery (may have received other treatments). Incremental costs for prostate cancer were the difference in costs for prostate cancer cases versus matched controls. Costs were divided into initial treatment (months -1 to 12), long-term (each 12 months thereafter), and total (months -1 to 60). Sensitivity analyses excluded the last 12 months of life. RESULTS: A total of 13,769 prostate-cancer cases were matched to 13,769 noncancer controls. Watchful waiting had the lowest initial treatment (Dollars 4270) and 5-year total costs (Dollars 9130). Initial treatment costs were highest for hormonal+radiation (Dollars 17,474) and surgery (Dollars 15,197). At Dollars 26,896, 5-year total costs were highest for hormonal therapy only followed by hormonal+radiation (Dollars 25,097) and surgery (Dollars 19,214). After excluding the last 12 months of life, total costs were highest for hormonal+radiation (Dollars 23,488) and hormonal therapy (Dollars 23,199). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of costs vary widely based on initial treatment. These data can inform patients and clinicians considering treatment options and policy makers interested in patterns of costs.