首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society >Therapeutic efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection with or without combined radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas in high risk locations
【24h】

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection with or without combined radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas in high risk locations

机译:经皮乙醇注射联合或不联合射频消融治疗高危部位肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) alone and combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in high risk locations. Materials and Methods: We performed PEI for HCCs in RFA-high risk locations, either alone or in combination with RFA. There were 20 HCCs (1.7 ±} 0.9 cm) in 20 patients (PEI group: n = 12; PEI + RFA group: n = 8). We evaluated technical success, local tumor progression and complications in both groups. Results: Technical success was achieved in all HCCs in both groups. During follow-up, local tumor progression was found in 41.7% (5/12) in the PEI group, whereas 12.5% (1/8) for the PEI + RFA group (p = 0.32). Bile duct dilatation was the most common complication, especially when the tumors were in periportal locations; 55% (5/9) in the PEI group and 50% (2/4) in the PEI + RFA group (p = 1.00). One patient in the PEI group developed severe biliary stricture and upstream dilatation that resulted in atrophy of the left hepatic lobe. One patient treated with PEI + RFA developed cholangitis and an abscess. Conclusion: Combined PEI and RFA treatment has a tendency to be more effective than PEI alone for managing HCCs in high risk locations, although the difference is not statistically significant. Even though PEI is generally accepted as a safe procedure, it may cause major biliary complications for managing HCCs adjacent to the portal vein.
机译:目的:评估经皮乙醇注射液(PEI)和射频消融(RFA)联合治疗高危地区肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:我们对RFA高风险地区的HCC进行了PEI,单独或与RFA结合使用。 20例患者中有20例HCC(1.7±} 0.9厘米)(PEI组:n = 12; PEI + RFA组:n = 8)。我们评估了两组的技术成功率,局部肿瘤进展和并发症。结果:两组所有HCC均取得了技术成功。在随访过程中,PEI组的局部肿瘤进展为41.7%(5/12),而PEI + RFA组为12.5%(1/8)(p = 0.32)。胆管扩张是最常见的并发症,尤其是当肿瘤位于门静脉位置时。 PEI组为55%(5/9),PEI + RFA组为50%(2/4)(p = 1.00)。 PEI组的一名患者出现了严重的胆道狭窄和上游扩张,导致左肝叶萎缩。一名接受PEI + RFA治疗的患者出现了胆管炎和脓肿。结论:PEI和RFA联合治疗比高PEI单独治疗高风险地区HCC的趋势要好,尽管差异在统计学上并不显着。尽管PEI通常被认为是安全的程序,但是它可能会导致严重的胆道并发症,以管理门静脉附近的HCC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号