...
首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society >Determination of optimal imaging mode for ultrasonographic detection of subdermal contraceptive rods: Comparison of spatial compound, conventional, and tissue harmonic imaging methods
【24h】

Determination of optimal imaging mode for ultrasonographic detection of subdermal contraceptive rods: Comparison of spatial compound, conventional, and tissue harmonic imaging methods

机译:超声检查皮下避孕棒的最佳成像模式的确定:空间复合成像,常规成像和组织谐波成像方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To determine which mode of ultrasonography (US), among the conventional, spatial compound, and tissue-harmonic methods, exhibits the best performance for the detection of Implanon? with respect to generation of posterior acoustic shadowing (PAS). Materials and Methods: A total of 21 patients, referred for localization of impalpable Implanon?, underwent US, using the three modes with default settings (i.e., wide focal zone). Representative transverse images of the rods, according to each mode for all patients, were obtained. The resulting 63 images were reviewed by four observers. The observers provided a confidence score for the presence of PAS, using a five-point scale ranging from 1 (definitely absent) to 5 (definitely present), with scores of 4 or 5 for PAS being considered as detection. The average scores of PAS, obtained from the three different modes for each observer, were compared using one-way repeated measure ANOVA. The detection rates were compared using a weighted least square method. Results: Statistically, the tissue harmonic mode was significantly superior to the other two modes, when comparing the average scores of PAS for all observers (p < 0.00-1). The detection rate was also highest for the tissue harmonic mode (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Tissue harmonic mode in uS appears to be the most suitable in detecting subdermal contraceptive implant rods.
机译:目的:确定在常规,空间复合和组织谐波方法中,哪种超声检查模式表现出最佳的Implanon检测性能?关于后声学阴影(PAS)的生成。材料和方法:使用默认设置的三种模式(即宽聚焦区)对总共21例因无法植入Implanon?进行定位的患者进行了US手术。根据所有患者的每种模式,获得了杆的代表性横向图像。得到的63张图像由四名观察员进行了审查。观察者使用范围从1(绝对不存在)到5(绝对存在)的五点量表提供了PAS的置信度评分,其中PAS的评分为4或5被视为检测结果。使用单向重复测量方差分析比较从每个观察者的三种不同模式获得的PAS的平均得分。使用加权最小二乘法比较检测率。结果:从统计学上讲,当比较所有观察者的PAS平均得分时,组织谐波模式显着优于其他两种模式(p <0.00-1)。对于组织谐波模式,检测率也最高(p <0.001)。结论:美国的组织谐波模式似乎最适合检测皮下避孕棒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号