首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society >Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae?
【24h】

Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae?

机译:脊柱或脊柱旁解剖标记是否有助于椎骨编号和诊断腰s部过渡性椎骨?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI. Materials and Methods: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-spine localizer, the diagnostic errors in numbering vertebral segments on lumbar MRI were evaluated. The morphology of S1-2 disc, L5 and S1 body, and lumbar spinous processes (SPs) were evaluated by using sagittal MRI. The positions of right renal artery (RRA), superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation (AB) and conus medullaris (CM) were described. Results: The diagnostic error for evaluation of vertebral segmentation on lumbar MRI alone was 14.1%. In lumbarization, all patients revealed a well-formed S1-2 disc with squared S1 body. A rhombus-shaped L5 body in sacralization and a rectangular-shaped S1 body in lumbarization were found. The L3 had the longest SP. The most common sites of spinal and paraspinal structures were: RRA at L1 body (53.6%) and L1-2 disc (34.1%), superior mesenteric artery at L1 body (55.1%) and T12-L1 disc (31.6%), and AB at L4 body (71.1%). CM had variable locations, changing from the T12-L1 disc to L2 body. They were located at higher sacralization and lower lumbarization. Conclusion: The spinal morphologic features and locations of the spinal and paraspinal structures on lumbar MRI are not completely reliable for the diagnosis of LSTVs and identification on the vertebral levels.
机译:目的:探讨脊柱和脊柱旁解剖标记物在腰s部过渡性椎骨(LSTVs)的诊断和腰椎MRI检查中对椎骨水平的鉴别中的价值。材料与方法:研究了1049名成年患者的腰部MRI。通过与全脊柱定位器进行比较,评估了腰部MRI椎骨节段编号的诊断错误。 S1-2椎间盘,L5和S1体以及腰椎棘突(SPs)的形态通过矢状MRI进行评估。描述了右肾动脉(RRA),肠系膜上动脉,主动脉分叉(AB)和圆锥延髓(CM)的位置。结果:仅通过腰部MRI评估椎骨分割的诊断错误率为14.1%。在腰椎穿刺术中,所有患者均显示出结构良好的S1-2椎间盘,且S1体呈方形。发现sa骨化的菱形L5体和腰椎化的矩形S1体。 L3的SP最长。脊柱和脊柱旁结构最常见的部位是:L1体的RRA(53.6%)和L1-2椎间盘(34.1%),L1体的肠系膜上动脉(55.1%)和T12-L1椎间盘(31.6%),以及L4身高的AB(71.1%)。 CM的位置可变,从T12-L1光盘变为L2机身。他们位于较高的cra骨化和较低的腰椎化。结论:腰部MRI的脊柱形态特征以及脊柱和脊柱旁结构的位置对于LSTV的诊断和椎骨水平的鉴别并不完全可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号