首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: Final results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
【24h】

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: Final results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

机译:培美曲塞联合顺铂与顺铂单药治疗复发性或转移性头颈癌患者:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,3期研究的最终结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with poor survival. Platinum-based chemotherapy is often a first-line treatment. Pemetrexed has shown single-agent activity in SCCHN and in combination with cisplatin for other tumors. This trial examined the efficacy of pemetrexed-cisplatin for SCCHN. METHODS: In a double-blind phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m 2; n = 398) or placebo plus cisplatin (75 mg/m 2; n = 397) to assess overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Median OS was 7.3 months in the pemetrexed-cisplatin arm and 6.3 months in the placebo-cisplatin arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.02; P =.082). Median progression-free survival (PFS, months) was similar in both treatment arms (pemetrexed-cisplatin, 3.6; placebo-cisplatin, 2.8; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; P =.166). Among patients with performance status 0 or 1, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 347) led to longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.83; P =.026; 4.0 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.84; P =.044, respectively). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancers, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 86) resulted in longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.59; P =.002; 4.0 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.73; P =.047, respectively). Pemetrexed-cisplatin toxicity was consistent with studies in other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed-cisplatin compared with placebo-cisplatin did not significantly improve survival for the intent-To-Treat population. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, pemetrexed-cisplatin showed OS and PFS advantage for patients with performance status 0 or 1 or oropharyngeal cancers.
机译:背景:头颈部复发或转移性鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)与不良生存有关。铂类化学疗法通常是一线治疗。培美曲塞已在SCCHN中显示出单药活性,并与顺铂联用治疗了其他肿瘤。该试验检查了培美曲塞-顺铂对SCCHN的疗效。方法:在一项双盲3期临床试验中,患有复发或转移性SCCHN且先前未进行过全身性转移性疾病治疗的患者被随机分配给培美曲塞(500 mg / m 2)加顺铂(75 mg / m 2; n = 398)或安慰剂加顺铂(75 mg / m 2; n = 397)评估总体生存率(OS)和次要终点。结果:培美曲塞-顺铂组的中位OS为7.3个月,安慰剂-顺铂组的中位OS为6.3个月(危险比[HR]为0.87; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.75-1.02; P = .082)。两组的中位无进展生存期(PFS,月)相似(培美曲塞-顺铂,3.6;安慰剂-顺铂,2.8; HR,0.88; 95%CI,0.76-1.03; P = .166)。在表现状态为0或1的患者中,培美曲塞-顺铂(n = 347)导致的OS和PFS比安慰剂-顺铂(n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7个月; HR,0.83; P = .026; 4.0 vs 3.0个月更长) ; HR,0.84; P = .044)。在口咽癌患者中,培美曲塞-顺铂(n = 86)比安慰剂-顺铂(n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1个月; HR,0.59; P = .002; 4.0 vs 3.4个月; HR, 0.73; P分别为.047)。培美曲塞-顺铂的毒性与其他肿瘤的研究一致。结论:与安慰剂-顺铂相比,培美曲塞-顺铂不能显着提高意图治疗人群的生存率。但是,在预先指定的亚组分析中,培美曲塞-顺铂对表现状态为0或1或口咽癌的患者显示OS和PFS的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号