首页> 外文期刊>Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte >Paces of Rationality in the History of Science: On the Temporal Structures of the Quantum Revolution
【24h】

Paces of Rationality in the History of Science: On the Temporal Structures of the Quantum Revolution

机译:科学史上的理性步伐:论量子革命的时间结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Paces of Rationality in the History of Science: On the Temporal Structures of the Quantum Revolution. I argue that the Kuhnian picture of scientific revolutions must be modified by introducing various levels of historical reality (or historiographical reconstruction) and reference points for rational justification in order to permit the constant movement back and forth between long shots and close-ups that is indispensable in the history of science. Such an account makes it possible to describe a scientific revolution not as a simultaneous break on all levels, but as a sequence of ruptures on different levels, in which some levels allow the for mulation of the new points of view or a Justification of the transition. The proposed account appears reconcilable both with Michael Friedman's recent philosophical analysis of the dynamics of reason, even though it also admits of social and technological levels that are not representing a constitutive a priori, and Michel Foucault's archeology of nature, which does not contradict the fact that in studying the history of physical theory one typically finds precisely formulated and well-separated levels of knowledge. It is ironic that Kuhn's original account, which helped to shape the,new epistemology', is still largely indebted to the Logical Empiricists' conception of a single linguistic framework, the establishment of which is merely a matter of convention and pragmatics. At the example of Mara Beller's assessment of the quantum revolution. I argue that the Kuhnian picture represents an obstacle against assessing one particular trait of the German physics of the 1920s, the important formative part played by philosophical convictions of the German physicist-philosophers.
机译:科学史上的理性步伐:关于量子革命的时间结构。我认为,必须通过引入不同水平的历史现实(或史学重构)和合理论证的参考点来修改科恩式的科学革命图景,以允许在远景和特写之间不断地来回移动是必不可少的在科学史上。这样的描述使得将科学革命描述为不是在各个层面上同时中断,而是在一系列不同层面上的破裂序列来描述是可能的,其中某些层面允许模拟新观点或过渡的理由。 。尽管迈克尔·弗里德曼(Michael Friedman)最近对理性的动力学进行了哲学分析,但该提议的表述似乎是对立的,尽管它也承认不代表先验先决条件的社会和技术水平,以及米歇尔·福柯的自然考古学(与事实不矛盾)。在研究物理理论的历史过程中,人们通常会找到经过精确配制和分离的知识水平。具有讽刺意味的是,库恩最初的观点有助于塑造“新认识论”,但在很大程度上仍然要归功于逻辑经验主义者对单一语言框架的构想,其建立仅仅是惯例和语用问题。以玛拉·贝勒(Mara Beller)对量子革命的评估为例。我认为,库纳式的图片代表了对评估1920年代德国物理学的一个特定特征的障碍,这是德国物理学家-哲学家的哲学信念所发挥的重要形成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号