首页> 外文期刊>Multiple sclerosis: clinical and laboratory research >Comparison of injection site pain and injection site reactions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta-1a or 1b.
【24h】

Comparison of injection site pain and injection site reactions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta-1a or 1b.

机译:干扰素β-1a或1b治疗的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者注射部位疼痛和注射部位反应的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This prospective, multicentre, international, observational, cohort study compared injection site pain (ISP) and injection site reactions (ISRS) between interferon beta-1b (IFNB-1b; Betaferon( (R))) 250 mug subcutaneously every other day and interferon beta-1a (IFNB-1a; Rebif((R))) 44 mug subcutaneously three times weekly in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients started treatment within 3 months before recruitment and were on full dose of therapy at inclusion. Patients self-injected IFNB and self-assessed ISP for 15 consecutive injections immediately, 30 and 60 min after injection, using a visual analogue scale diary. Study staff assessed ISRS. Of 445 patients (valid cases), ~90% used autoinjectors. More patients were pain-free at all timepoints with IFNB-1b than with IFNB-1a (eg, 30 min: 42.6% versus 19.7%; P< 0.0001). The mean proportion of pain-free injections was greater for IFNB-1b (eg, 30 min: 79.0%) than for IFNB-1a (53.3%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients without ISRS was greater for IFNB-1b (second visit 51.8% versus 33.8%; P < 0.0001). Compared with IFNB-1a, more IFNB-1b patients either had no pain or their ISP had no influence on treatment satisfaction (76.9% versus 64.1%; P = 0.006). The impact on tolerability and patient acceptability of any new IFNB product formulations would, however, have to be evaluated in comparative studies. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13 : 1153-1160. http://msj.sagepub.com.
机译:这项前瞻性,多中心,国际,观察性队列研究比较了隔天皮下注射250马克干扰素β-1b(IFNB-1b; Betaferon(R))与注射干扰素之间的注射部位疼痛(ISP)和注射部位反应(ISRS)。复发缓解型MS患者每周皮下注射3次β-1a(IFNB-1a; Rebif(R))44杯。患者在募集前3个月内开始治疗,入院时接受全剂量治疗。使用视觉模拟量表日记,患者在注射后30分钟和60分钟立即连续15次连续注射自我注射IFNB和自我评估的ISP。研究人员评估了ISRS。在445例患者(有效病例)中,约90%使用了自动注射器。与IFNB-1a相比,在所有时间点使用IFNB-1b的患者无疼痛的比例更高(例如30分钟:42.6%对19.7%; P <0.0001)。 IFNB-1b的平均无痛注射比例(例如30分钟:79.0%)大于IFNB-1a的平均无痛注射比例(53.3%; P <0.0001)。 IFNB-1b无ISRS的患者比例更高(第二次访视为51.8%对33.8%; P <0.0001)。与IFNB-1a相比,更多的IFNB-1b患者没有疼痛或他们的ISP对治疗满意度没有影响(76.9%对64.1%; P = 0.006)。但是,必须在比较研究中评估任何新的IFNB产品制剂对耐受性和患者可接受性的影响。 2007年的多发性硬化症; 13:1153-1160。 http://msj.sagepub.com。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号