首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Coevolution, communication, and host chick mimicry in parasitic finches: who mimics whom?
【24h】

Coevolution, communication, and host chick mimicry in parasitic finches: who mimics whom?

机译:协同进化,交流和寄居幼鸟模仿寄生雀:谁模仿谁?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Why do brood parasitic Vidua nestlings mimic the intricate gape patterns of their hosts' young so precisely? The classic explanation is that mimicry is the outcome of a coevolutionary arms race, driven by host rejection of odd-looking offspring. Selection favors parasitic nestlings that converge on the host young's mouth markings, and simultaneously benefits hosts whose mouth markings diverge from those of the parasite. The outcome is highly elaborate mouth markings in host young that are accurately mimicked by parasite nestlings. Our review of recent work provides mixed support for this traditional view and, instead suggest that complex mouth markings function to stimulate adequate provisioning, rather than to signal species identity. Thus, similarly elaborate gape morphologies in hosts and parasites could have evolved through nestling competition for parental care. According to this view, and in contrast with existing hypotheses, it is host young that mimic parasitic offspring, in order to compete effectively for food.
机译:为何寄生寄生的Vidua幼雏能如此精确地模仿寄主幼鸟的错综复杂的缝隙模式?经典的解释是,模仿是共同进化军备竞赛的结果,这是寄主拒绝看似奇异的后代的结果。选择有利于聚集在寄主幼体口纹上的寄生雏鸟,同时也有利于寄主的口纹不同于寄生虫的寄主。结果是寄主幼鸟的口齿精细,被寄生虫的雏鸟准确地模仿了。我们对最新工作的评论为这种传统观点提供了混合的支持,而是暗示了复杂的嘴标记的作用是刺激充足的食物供应,而不是发出物种标识的信号。因此,宿主和寄生虫中类似的精心设计的缺口形态可能是通过对父母照料的竞争而形成的。根据这种观点,并且与现有的假设相反,是寄主的年轻人模仿寄生的后代,以便有效地竞争食物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号