首页> 外文期刊>Molecular biology reports >Lymphatic microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor-C and -D as prognostic factors in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
【24h】

Lymphatic microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor-C and -D as prognostic factors in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

机译:淋巴管微血管密度和血管内皮生长因子-C和-D作为乳腺癌的预后因素:系统评价和文献荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The use of lymphatic microvessel density (LVD) and pro-lymphangiogenic mediators as prognostic factors for survival in breast cancer remains controversial. We searched the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE without language restrictions for relevant literature to aggregate the survival results. To be eligible, every study had to include the assessment of the LVD or the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C or -D in patients with breast cancer and provide a survival comparison, including disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), according to the LVD, VEGF-C or VEGF-D status. Across all studies, 56.64 % of patients were considered to have a VEGF-C-positive tumor, and 65.54 % of patients had VEGF-D-positive tumors. High LVD had an unfavorable impact on DFS, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 2.222 (95 % CI 1.579–3.126) and an OS with a HR of 2.493 (95 % CI 1.183–5.25). According to the different lymphatic makers, the subgroup HR in the D2-40 studies was 2.431 (95 % CI 1.622–3.644) for DFS and 4.085 (95 % CI 1.896–8.799) for OS. VEGF-C overexpression, as assessed by immunochemistry, was a prognostic factor for decreased DFS (HR 2.164; 95 % CI 1.256–3.729) and for decreased OS (HR 2.613; 95 % CI 1.637–4.170). VEGF-D overexpression was a significant although weak prognostic factor for DFS only when assessed by immunochemistry, with a HR of 2.108 (95 % CI 1.014–4.384). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that LVD, VEGF-C and VEGF-D could predict poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. However, standardization of the assessment of LVD and for the expression of lymphangiogenesis factors is needed.
机译:淋巴管微血管密度(LVD)和促淋巴管生成介质作为乳腺癌生存预后因素的使用仍存在争议。我们搜索了无语言限制的电子数据库PubMed和EMBASE,以获取相关文献,以汇总生存结果。为了符合资格,每项研究都必须包括评估乳腺癌患者的LVD或血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)-C或-D的表达,并提供生存率比较,包括无病生存期(DFS)或根据LVD,VEGF-C或VEGF-D状态的总体生存(OS)。在所有研究中,56.64%的患者被认为患有VEGF-C阳性肿瘤,而65.54%的患者被认为具有VEGF-D阳性肿瘤。高LVD对DFS产生不利影响,合并风险比(HR)为2.222(95%CI 1.579-3.126),OS为2.493(95%CI 1.183-5.25)。根据不同的淋巴组织,在D2-40研究中,DFS的亚组HR为2.431(95%CI 1.622–3.644),而OS为4.085(95%CI 1.896–8.799)。通过免疫化学评估,VEGF-C过表达是DFS降低(HR 2.164; 95%CI 1.256–3.729)和OS降低(HR 2.613; 95%CI 1.637–4.170)的预后因素。 VEGF-D过表达是重要的,尽管仅通过免疫化学评估DFS的预后较弱,HR为2.108(95%CI 1.014-4.384)。我们的荟萃分析表明,LVD,VEGF-C和VEGF-D可以预测乳腺癌患者的不良预后。但是,需要对LVD评估和淋巴管生成因子表达进行标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号