...
【24h】

Measurement Issues with Geo-positional Forensics

机译:地理位置取证的测量问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this paper is to discuss the measurement issues in geo-positional forensics and the need to consider these issues from a measurement perspective when geo-positional data is to be used in a digital forensics investigation. As such this is a positional paper looking at the challenges of using geo-positional data in digital investigations and identifying the opportunities to enhance digital investigations by including spatial data. The use of geo-positional data in digital investigations has the potential to contribute to measurement science where there are situations or cases where questions of criminal, unethical or nonprofessional behaviour arise in the for example measuring pollutants, contaminants, radioactivity and there is a need to measure the spatial location of these data as well as measure the amount or volume. In this paper the specific measurement issues associated with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and geo-positional forensics will be discussed. The relationship between measurement science and digital forensics has been discussed previously [1]. Geo-positional forensics makes use of the advances in technology and the almost ubiquitous nature of devices which have global positional capacity to add a spatial dimension to digital evidence. The GPS technology has remained reasonably static over the last 10 years, but what has changed radically in the last 5 years there has been significant advance in the devices which utilise Global Positioning System (GPS) technologies, including smart phones, satellite navigation systems for cars and GPS tracking devices themselves. The new range of devices that are either specific GPS devices or embed GPS functionality provide a new avenue for digital investigators to collect an additional form of digital evidence. The growth in the number of devices with GPS capability also means that more of the crimes that are committed (either cybercrime or indeed traditional crimes) have the potential of containing GPS information with can be used as digital evidence in geo-positional forensics. The paper will focus on the use of Global Position System technologies and will not discuss other tracking technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Geographic Information Systems (GIS) or Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN).
机译:本文的目的是讨论地理取证中的测量问题以及在数字取证调查中使用地理数据时需要从测量角度考虑这些问题。因此,这是一份立场文件,着眼于在数字调查中使用地理位置数据的挑战,并通过包含空间数据来识别增强数字调查的机会。在某些情况下或在某些情况下,例如在测量污染物,污染物,放射性的过程中出现犯罪,不道德或非专业行为的问题时,在数字调查中使用地理位置数据有可能有助于测量科学的发展。测量这些数据的空间位置以及量或量。在本文中,将讨论与全球定位系统(GPS)和地理位置取证相关的特定测量问题。测量科学和数字取证之间的关系先前已有讨论[1]。地理取证利用了技术的进步和设备的几乎无处不在的特性,这些设备具有全球定位能力,可以为数字证据增加空间维度。在过去的10年中,GPS技术一直保持合理的静态,但是在过去的5年中发生了根本性的变化,利用全球定位系统(GPS)技术的设备取得了重大进步,包括智能电话,汽车卫星导航系统和GPS跟踪设备本身。新的设备范围既可以是特定的GPS设备,也可以是嵌入式GPS功能,这为数字调查人员收集新形式的数字证据提供了一条新途径。具有GPS功能的设备数量的增加也意味着,更多的犯罪行为(网络犯罪或实际上是传统犯罪)都可能包含GPS信息,可以用作地理取证的数字证据。本文将重点关注全球定位系统技术的使用,而不会讨论其他跟踪技术,例如射频识别(RFID),地理信息系统(GIS)或无线局域网(WLAN)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号