...
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement Science & Technology >Two calibration procedures for a gyroscope-free inertial measurement system based on a double-pendulum apparatus
【24h】

Two calibration procedures for a gyroscope-free inertial measurement system based on a double-pendulum apparatus

机译:基于双摆锤的无陀螺仪惯性测量系统的两个校准程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a novel calibration algorithm to be used with a gyro-free inertial measurement unit (GF-IMU) based on the use of linear accelerometers (AC). The analytical approach can be implemented in two calibration procedures. The first procedure (P-I) is articulated in the conduction of a static trial, to compute the sensitivity and the direction of the sensing axis of each AC, followed by a dynamic trial, to determine the AC locations. By contrast, the latter procedure (P-II) consists in the calculation of the previously indicated calibration parameters by means of a dynamic trial only. The feasibility of the two calibration procedures has been investigated by testing two GF-IMUs, equipped with ten and six bi-axial linear ACs, with an ad hoc instrumented double-pendulum apparatus. P-I and P-II were compared to a calibration procedure used as a reference (P-REF), which incorporates the AC positions measured with an optoelectronic system. The experimental results we present in this paper demonstrate that (i) P-I is able to determine the calibration parameters of the AC array with a higher accuracy than P-II; (ii) consequently, the errors associated with translational (a_(0) - g) and rotational (omega) acceleration components for the two GF-IMUs are significantly greater using P-II than P-I and (iii) the errors in (a_(0) - g) and omega obtained with P-I are comparable with the ones obtainable by using P-REF. Thus, the proposed novel algorithm used in P-I, in conjunction with the double-pendulum apparatus, can be globally considered a viable tool in GF-IMU calibration.
机译:本文提出了一种新颖的校准算法,该算法将基于线性加速度计(AC)与无陀螺惯性测量单元(GF-IMU)一起使用。该分析方法可以在两个校准过程中实施。在进行静态试验时,先要进行第一个程序(P-1),以计算每个AC的灵敏度和感测轴的方向,然后进行动态试验,以确定AC的位置。相比之下,后一种方法(P-II)在于仅通过动态试验来计算先前指示的校准参数。通过测试两个装有十个和六个双轴线性AC的GF-IMU,以及一个特制的双摆锤装置,研究了这两种校准程序的可行性。将P-I和P-II与用作参考的校准程序(P-REF)进行了比较,该程序包含了用光电系统测量的AC位置。我们在本文中给出的实验结果表明:(i)P-I能够以比P-II更高的精度确定AC阵列的校准参数; (ii)因此,使用P-II与两个GF-IMU的平移(a_(0)-g)和旋转(ω)加速度分量相关的误差明显大于PI,并且(iii)(a_( 0)-g)和使用PI获得的欧米茄与使用P-REF获得的相当。因此,与双摆锤装置结合使用的,在P-1中使用的新算法可以被认为是GF-IMU校准中的可行工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号