...
首页> 外文期刊>Mealey s Litigation Report: Lead >Appellate Panel Reverses, Finds Landlord Acted Properly To Remedy Lead Hazard
【24h】

Appellate Panel Reverses, Finds Landlord Acted Properly To Remedy Lead Hazard

机译:上诉小组推翻,认为房东已采取适当措施纠正铅危险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Alexandra Fildere-Brown, on behalf of her daughter Amaiya A. Brown, sued Maple 3 LLC in the Kings County Supreme Court, alleging injuries as a result of poisoning from lead-based paint while living in a premises owned and operated by Maple 3. Brown alleged that Maple 3 had breached the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (RLPHRA), 42 U.S. Code Section 4851, and she sought punitive damages. Maple 3 moved for summary judgment dismissal, arguing that Brown lacked standing to bring her claim under the RLPHRA and was not entitled to punitive damages.
机译:亚历山德拉·菲尔德雷·布朗(Alexandra Fildere-Brown)代表她的女儿Amaiya A.Brown在金斯县最高法院起诉Maple 3 LLC,指控居住在Maple 3拥有和经营的场所时因铅基涂料中毒而受伤。布朗声称Maple 3违反了1992年《住宅铅基油漆减少危害法》(RLPHRA),《美国法典》第42条第4851条,她寻求惩罚性赔偿。 Maple 3要求驳回简易判决,理由是Brown缺乏根据RLPHRA提出索赔的资格,无权获得惩罚性赔偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号