首页> 外文期刊>Memory & cognition >The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course
【24h】

The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course

机译:视觉听觉颜色词Stroop不对称性及其时程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Four experiments examined crossmodal versions of the Stroop task in order (1) to look for Stroop asymmetries in color naming, spoken-word naming, and written-word naming and to evaluate the time course of these asymmetries, and (2) to compare these findings to current models of the Stroop effect. Participants named color patches while ignoring spoken color words presented with an onset varying from 300 msec before to 300 msec after the onset of the color (Experiment 1), or they named the spoken words and ignored the colors (Experiment 2). A secondary visual detection task assured that the participants looked at the colors in both tasks. Spoken color words yielded Stroop effects in color naming, but colors did not yield an effect in spoken-word naming at any stimulus onset asynchrony. This asymmetry in effects was obtained with equivalent color- and spoken-word-naming latencies. Written color words yielded a Stroop effect in naming spoken words (Experiment 3), and spoken color words yielded an effect in naming written words (Experiment 4). These results were interpreted as most consistent with an architectural account of the color-word Stroop asymmetry, in contrast with discriminability and pathway strength accounts.
机译:四个实验检查了Stroop任务的交叉模式版本,以便(1)在颜色命名,口语命名和书面词命名中查找Stroop不对称性,并评估这些不对称性的时间过程,以及(2)进行比较对Stroop效应当前模型的发现。参与者在命名颜色补丁时忽略了出现的口头颜色单词(从颜色开始之前的300毫秒到出现颜色后的300毫秒)(实验1),或者他们对口头单词命名并忽略了颜色(实验2)。辅助视觉检测任务确保参与者看着两个任务中的颜色。口语颜色词在颜色命名中产生Stroop效果,但是在任何刺激声起效异步下,颜色在口头单词命名中均不产生影响。这种效果的不对称是通过等效的颜色和口语命名延迟获得的。书面色彩词在口语命名中产生Stroop效果(实验3),而语音色彩词在书面语中命名产生效果(实验4)。这些结果被解释为与颜色词Stroop不对称性的体系结构说明最一致,与可辨别性和路径强度说明相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号