...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular biology and evolution >Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications
【24h】

Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications

机译:cor蒲叶绿体基因组分析及其系统发育意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Determining the phylogenetic relationships among the major lines of angiosperms is a long-standing problem, yet the uncertainty as to the phylogenefic affinity of these lines persists. While a number of studies have suggested that the ANITA (Amborella-Nymphaeates-Illiciales-Trimeniales-Aristolochiales) grade is basal within angiosperms, studies of complete chloroplast genome sequences also suggested an alternative tree, wherein the line leading to the grasses branches first among the angiosperms. To improve taxon sampling in the existing chloroplast genome data, we sequenced the chloroplast genome of the monocot Acorus calamus. We generated a concatenated alignment (89,436 positions for 15 taxa), encompassing almost all sequences usable for phylogeny reconstruction within spermatophytes. The data still contain support for both the ANITA-basal and grasses-basal hypotheses. Using simulations we can show that were the ANITA-basal hypothesis true, parsimony (and distance-based methods with many models) would be expected to fail to recover it. The self-evident explanation for this failure appears to be a long-branch attraction (LBA) between the clade of grasses and the out-group. However, this LBA cannot explain the discrepancies observed between tree topology recovered using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the topologies recovered using the parsimony and distance-based methods when grasses are deleted. Furthermore, the fact that neither maximum parsimony nor distance methods consistently recover the ML tree, when according to the simulations they would be expected to, when the out-group (Pinus) is deleted, suggests that either the generating tree is not correct or the best symmetric model is misspecified (or both). We demonstrate that the tree recovered under ML is extremely sensitive to model specification and that the best symmetric model is misspecified. Hence, we remain agnostic regarding phylogenetic relationships among basal angiosperm lineages.
机译:确定被子植物主要系之间的系统发育关系是一个长期存在的问题,但是这些系的系统发生亲和力仍存在不确定性。虽然许多研究表明,ANITA(Amborella-Nymphaeates-Illiciales-Trimeniales-Aristolochiales)等级是被子植物内的基础,但对完整叶绿体基因组序列的研究也提出了另一种树,其中通往草的线首先在被子植物中分支。被子植物。为了改善现有叶绿体基因组数据中的分类群采样,我们对单子叶植物A蒲的叶绿体基因组进行了测序。我们生成了一个串联的比对(15个分类单元的89,436个位置),涵盖了几乎所有可用于精子植物内系统发育重建的序列。数据仍然包含对ANITA基本假设和草基假设的支持。使用模拟我们可以证明,如果ANITA基本假设是正确的,则简约(以及许多模型的基于距离的方法)将无法恢复。对此失败的不言而喻的解释似乎是草丛和外群之间的长期分支吸引(LBA)。但是,此LBA无法解释删除草时使用最大似然(ML)方法恢复的树拓扑与使用简约和基于距离的方法恢复的拓扑之间观察到的差异。此外,最大的简约方法和距离方法都不能一致地恢复ML树,这一事实表明,根据模拟,当删除组外(Pinus)时,它们有望恢复,这表明生成树不正确或最佳对称模型指定错误(或同时指定)。我们证明了在ML下恢复的树对模型规格极其敏感,并且最佳对称模型的规格不正确。因此,我们仍然不知道基础被子植物谱系之间的系统发育关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号