首页> 外文期刊>Molecular and Cellular Probes: The Location, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Disease by Specific Molecules and Cell Lines >A comparison of sample preparation methods for PCR detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica from ground pork using swabbing and slurry homogenate techniques.
【24h】

A comparison of sample preparation methods for PCR detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica from ground pork using swabbing and slurry homogenate techniques.

机译:使用擦拭和浆液匀浆技术从猪肉粉中PCR检测致病性小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的样品制备方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two sample preparation methods for multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of plasmid-bearing virulent Yersinia enterocolitica (YEP(+)) from ground pork were compared. Two sets of ground pork samples were inoculated with 10, 1, and 0.5 CFU/cm(2) of a YEP(+) strain, one set was swabbed and the second set was dispersed into a slurry homogenate. Both swab and slurry homogenate samples were enriched in sterile Whirl Pak bags containing modified trypticase soy broth for 48 h at 12 degrees C. From the enriched swab samples, the bacterial cells were pelleted, washed, boiled in sterile distilled water, and treated with proteinase K to prepare cell lysates to use as a DNA template. Since slurry homogenate samples contained food material, DNA extraction was performed using a commercial kit. The DNA from cell lysates and from extracted slurry homogenate samples were evaluated as templates for multiplex PCR employing primers for the chromosomal ail and plasmid virF genes. The enrichment of the YEP(+) strain was more efficient using the sponge-swabbed samples than the slurry homogenate samples at all three inoculum levels tested. It was necessary to dilute the DNA extracted from slurry homogenate to determine the optimal concentration of each sample for PCR amplification. No amplification signal was detected using undiluted DNA, possibly due to DNA inhibitors present in the slurry homogenate that were not removed in the process of extraction. However, DNA could be detected in undiluted cell lysates from swab samples. Thus, the cell lysates from swab samples are more advantageous than DNA extracted from ground pork slurry homogenate samples for the PCR assay.
机译:比较了两种用多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)制备的方法从猪肉粉中检测携带质粒的强毒小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌(YEP(+))。两组猪肉碎样品分别接种10、1和0.5 CFU / cm(2)的YEP(+)菌株,擦拭一组,第二组分散到浆液匀浆中。将拭子和浆液匀浆样品均在装有改性胰蛋白酶的大豆肉汤的无菌Whirl Pak袋中于12摄氏度下浓缩48小时。从浓缩的拭子样品中,将细菌细胞沉淀,洗涤,在无菌蒸馏水中煮沸并用蛋白酶处理。 K制备细胞裂解液以用作DNA模板。由于浆液匀浆样品中含有食品原料,因此使用商业试剂盒进行DNA提取。将细胞裂解液和提取的浆液匀浆样品中的DNA评估为模板,用于多重PCR,该方法使用了染色体ail和质粒virF基因的引物。在所有三种接种物水平下,使用海绵擦拭的样品,YEP(+)菌株的富集比浆料匀浆的样品更有效。必须稀释从浆液匀浆中提取的DNA,以确定用于PCR扩增的每个样品的最佳浓度。使用未稀释的DNA未检测到扩增信号,这可能是由于浆液匀浆中存在的DNA抑制剂在提取过程中未去除。但是,可以从拭子样品的未稀释细胞裂解物中检测到DNA。因此,拭子样品的细胞裂解物比从碎猪肉浆匀浆样品中提取的DNA进行PCR检测更有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号