Objective To compare real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR with general PCR in detecting bovine and porcine derived materials in hydrolysate samples.Methods DNA were extracted from hydrolysate samples which prepared by different steps by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and general PCR.Results DNA of bovine and porcine could be detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and general PCR in samples prepared in the processes before enzymolysis solution, but not detected in samples from supermatant to the fourth ultrafiltrate.Conclusion Both real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and general PCR can be applied to detect the fragments in hydrolysate samples.And real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR has the advantage such as rapid,convenient, non-environment-polluted, good repeatability, which improves the quality and efficiency.%目的:对比实时荧光定量PCR与常规PCR检测肝水解肽样品中牛、猪源性成分的有效性。方法对牛、猪源性肝水解肽样品肝脏至上清液工艺段样品进行DNA提取,采用实时荧光定量PCR和常规PCR同时检测样品中的DNA。结果实时荧光定量PCR和常规PCR在猪源、牛源肝水解肽从肝脏到酶解液的各工艺步骤段样品中,均检测到动物源性DNA,在上清液至超滤液四中,均未检测出动物源性DNA。结论两种方法均可用在检测肝水解肽样品中牛、猪源性成分。实时荧光定量PCR同时还具有快速、简便、不污染环境、重复性好的特点,可明显提高工作质量及效率。
展开▼