...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular and Cellular Probes: The Location, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Disease by Specific Molecules and Cell Lines >Direct identification of chlamydiae from clinical samples using a DNA microarray assay-A validation study.
【24h】

Direct identification of chlamydiae from clinical samples using a DNA microarray assay-A validation study.

机译:使用DNA芯片检测-A验证研究从临床样品中直接鉴定衣原体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While DNA microarrays have become a widely accepted tool for mRNA expression monitoring, their use in rapid diagnosis of bacterial and viral pathogens is only emerging. So far, insufficient sensitivity and high costs have been the major limiting factors preventing more widespread use of microarray platforms in direct testing of clinical samples. In the present study, a total of 339 samples, among them 293 clinical specimens from animals and humans, were examined by the ArrayTubetrade mark (AT) DNA microarray assay to detect chlamydial DNA and identify the species of Chlamydia and Chlamydophila involved. Samples included nasal and conjunctival swabs, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh organ tissue, milk, feces and cell culture. Notably, the AT test was shown to detect mixed infections in clinical samples. The calculated median sensitivity of 0.81 over the entire panel of clinical samples was comparable to conventional 16S PCR, but slightly lower than real-time PCR and other PCR assays. However,when a panel of long-time stored swab samples was excluded from the calculation, the sensitivity was clearly higher (0.87) and equivalent to that of real-time PCR. Altogether, the data demonstrate the suitability of this DNA microarray assay for routine diagnosis.
机译:尽管DNA微阵列已成为用于mRNA表达监测的广泛接受的工具,但它们在快速诊断细菌和病毒病原体中的应用才刚刚出现。迄今为止,灵敏度不足和高成本已成为阻止微阵列平台在临床样品直接测试中更广泛使用的主要限制因素。在本研究中,通过ArrayTubetrade标记(AT)DNA微阵列测定法检查了总共339个样品,其中包括293个动物和人类的临床标本,以检测衣原体DNA并鉴定所涉衣原体和衣原体的种类。样本包括鼻和结膜拭子,福尔马林固定的,石蜡包埋的和新鲜的器官组织,牛奶,粪便和细胞培养物。值得注意的是,AT测试显示可检测到临床样本中的混合感染。在整个临床样本中,计算得出的中值灵敏度为0.81,与传统的16S PCR相当,但略低于实时PCR和其他PCR分析。但是,当将一组长期存储的拭子样本从计算中排除时,灵敏度显然更高(0.87),与实时PCR相当。总而言之,数据表明该DNA微阵列测定法适合常规诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号