...
首页> 外文期刊>Military Medicine: Official Journal of AMSUS, The Society of the Federal Health Agencies >Odds of hospitalization among Marine Corps personnel by military occupational specialty and causative agents during OEF and OIF.
【24h】

Odds of hospitalization among Marine Corps personnel by military occupational specialty and causative agents during OEF and OIF.

机译:在OEF和OIF期间,海军陆战队人员因军事职业专业和病因而住院的可能性很高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the risk of hospitalization among Marines deployed during Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom by military occupational specialty (MOS). METHODS: Trends in risk of hospitalization as a function of injury cause (explosive munitions and small arms [EM/SA]), anatomical location, and injury type were analyzed to identify which MOSs were more likely to have open wound injuries or trauma to the extremities. The study population consisted of 163,939 Marines deployed at any time during the study period (September 11, 2001-January 31, 2007). Hospitalized Marines (n=2718) were matched to nonhospitalized Marines on rank, time deployed, and number of deployments. RESULTS: Noninfantry MOSs had lower risk of hospitalization compared with infantry, regardless of injury cause or location. Trends differed for EM/SA versus other injury causative agents, but did not differ by anatomical location among EM/SA. CONCLUSION: This information allows for quantitative assessment of risk by MOS in combat situations.
机译:目的:本研究调查了在军事行动专业(MOS)的“持久行动”和“伊拉克自由”行动中部署的海军陆战队中住院的风险。方法:分析因受伤原因(爆炸弹药和小武器[EM / SA]),解剖位置和伤害类型而导致住院的风险趋势,以确定哪些MOS更可能发生开放性伤口损伤或创伤。四肢。研究人口包括在研究期间(2001年9月11日至2007年1月31日)随时部署的163,939名海军陆战队员。住院海军陆战队(n = 2718)在等级,部署时间和部署数量上与未住院的海军陆战队相匹配。结果:无论步兵受伤原因或位置如何,非步兵MOS的住院风险均比步兵低。 EM / SA与其他致伤因素的趋势有所不同,但在EM / SA之间的解剖位置上却没有差异。结论:这些信息可以使MOS在战斗情况下对风险进行定量评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号