首页> 外文期刊>Minimally invasive therapy and allied technologies: MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy >The safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients older than sixty with stratification based on ASA score.
【24h】

The safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients older than sixty with stratification based on ASA score.

机译:基于ASA评分,对60岁以上高危患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in patients older than sixty years of age, with stratification based on the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score. For five years, 137 patients older than sixty, who had undergone a LC for AC, were classified into three groups; ASA 1 (n = 33), ASA 2 (n = 79) and ASA 3 (n = 25). Preoperative percutaneous gallbladder drainage was performed in eight of the 137 cases (5.8%). All except one underwent one-stage management and 19.7% patients underwent emergency surgery within 24 hours of the index admission of AC. The preoperative hospital stay for ASA 3 (8.8 days) was longer than that for ASA 1 (5.6 days). There was a higher proportion of complicated cholecystitis and a longer operating time in ASA 2 (50.6%, 111 min.) and 3 (66.7 %, 114 min.) than in ASA 1 (24.2%, 85 min.) (p<0.05). Morbidity was more frequent in ASA 3 (20.0%) than in ASA 1 (9.1%). However, the open conversion rate, time to diet, and postoperative hospital stay were similar in the three groups (p>0.05). We conclude that a LC for AC may be an effective treatment option in elderly-high risk patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是根据ASA(美国麻醉医师学会)评分,对60岁以上患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的安全性进行评估。在过去的五年中,将接受过LC的AC的137名年龄在60岁以上的患者分为三类: ASA 1(n = 33),ASA 2(n = 79)和ASA 3(n = 25)。 137例中的8例进行了术前经皮胆囊引流(5.8%)。除一名患者接受一期治疗外,其余所有患者中有19.7%的患者在AC指数入院后24小时内接受了紧急手术。 ASA 3的术前住院时间(8.8天)比ASA 1的术前住院时间(5.6天)更长。与ASA 1(24.2%,85分钟)相比,ASA 2(50.6%,111分钟)和3(66.7%,114分钟)的复杂性胆囊炎比例更高,手术时间更长(p <0.05 )。 ASA 3(20.0%)比ASA 1(9.1%)的发病率更高。然而,三组的开放转化率,饮食时间和术后住院时间相似(p> 0.05)。我们得出结论,对于老年高危患者,LC进行AC可能是一种有效的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号